The 75th World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting is scheduled to take place from May 22 to 28, a meeting at which Taiwan’s return as an observer is becoming increasingly possible.
US Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brain McKeon has clearly articulated to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the US supports Taiwan’s attendance at the meeting with observer status, along with a continued investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
This shows that Washington continues to pursue Taiwan’s interests, and that there remains a chance for Taiwan to attend the WHA meeting, despite not having yet received an invitation.
McKeon is of the same rank as US Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman. Unlike Sherman, who must constantly shuttle between countries, McKeon is responsible for the State Department’s management and resources.
It falls to McKeon to “remind” Tedros of the contingencies attached to US funding of the WHO. This fact is important especially now, given that attendees at the upcoming WHA meeting are to vote to determine whether Tedros should receive a second five-year term.
The intervention of US President Joe Biden’s administration at this crucial time is intended to send a clear message to Tedros about its support for Taiwan’s attendance.
Whether Taiwan can attend with observer nation status, as it has before, depends on whether Tedros issues an invitation. Should Tedros reject the US’ “suggestion,” the administration could ask US allies to not support his reappointment. Another option would be for the US to withhold its membership fees.
Former US president Donald Trump two years ago froze US funding of the WHO. He said that the organization under Tedros had been too willing to take its cues from Beijing and trust its COVID-19 data, a trust that led to rapid spread of the virus.
The state department said that funding would not resume until Tedros stepped down, and it called for an investigation into the origin of SARS-CoV-2.
Trump reasoned that the US contributed 10 times as much as China to the organization, between US$400 million to US$500 million, or about 14 percent of the WHO’s budget, funding that was of crucial importance to the WHO.
When appeals for reform of the institution were not met with a substantial response, the Trump administration announced in July 2020 that it would be withdrawing from the WHO, as of a year later, and proposed the creation of a new international health organization to replace the WHO.
Biden reversed the decision on his first day in office and WHO funding resumed. However, his administration continues to pressure the health body to reform and to investigate the origins of the virus.
There was an evident change in Tedros’ China-friendly stance. In October last year, the WHO said it would form a task force to open a second round of investigations on the virus’ origin, and Tedros followed the US stance that it might have leaked from a Wuhan laboratory, asking China to make its data available to the investigation.
The growing distance between Tedros and China was suggested when Beijing did not indicate support for Tedros’ reappointment.
Whether Tedros continues to be Beijing’s pawn or sides with the West could determine whether Taiwan attends next month’s WHA meeting.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS