Since the beginning of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, Taiwan has sent comprehensive aid to the eastern European country in several ways, even though it has no official diplomatic relations with either side. Taiwan’s actions include economic sanctions against Russia, condemnation of Putin’s war and helping Ukrainian refugees through humanitarian aid.
As part of international sanctions against Russia, Taiwan has joined a list of countries that have banned Russian banks from using the SWIFT international payment system. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, one of the largest global chipmakers, has suspended all sales to Russia and its suppliers.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), Vice President William Lai (賴清德) and Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) each promised to donate one month’s salary toward aid efforts in the country, and underlined Taiwan’s support of Ukraine, democracy and freedom.
Marches for peace have taken place across Taiwan, including a “die-in” protest over the Bucha massacre in Ukraine.
Taiwanese have also shown humanitarian support, with monetary donations to support displaced people, while the government has donated NT$28.67 million (US$981,547) each to the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia to assist Ukrainian refugees. In just 18 days, a Taiwanese non-profit raised NT$740 million for Ukraine.
Taiwan can go even further, but it must first address one of the pressure issues facing leaders: whether the government should change its asylum law.
Since the start of the war, several Ukrainian residents in Taiwan have gathered outside the Russian representative office in Taipei to protest Putin’s invasion of their homeland, demanding an urgent truce and urging Taiwan’s government to accept Ukrainian refugees. They also called on the government to update its asylum rules, an issue that has been reframed since Beijing’s crackdown in Hong Kong.
An asylum law has been stuck in the legislature for almost 14 years, and its enacment requires the passage of supplementary laws. A proposed bill has not advanced because various problems remain unresolved and there is no consensus on how to proceed.
Non-governmental organizations handle refugee and asylum-seeker issues by negotiating with government agencies, such as the National Immigration Agency. The organizations look after refugees, but are rarely able to obtain residence permits for them.
When considering an asylum law, there are three key problems to address: the political sensitivities surrounding Taiwan and China, Taiwan’s national security and the risk of overburdening the asylum system.
One major point of disagreement is whether asylum legislation should cover people from China, Hong Kong and Macau. By adding them to such a law, Taiwan would be formally recognizing people from those regions as non-citizens, implying a shift in its sovereignty claim.
From the perspective of national security, as Taiwanese are wary of infiltration by Chinese spies, the government and a vast portion of the public oppose an asylum law. On the other hand, Chinese agents could enter Taiwan in a variety of ways rather than as refugees, making student, investment and tourist visas better alternatives.
Another concern is that a large influx of people fleeing China and Hong Kong, or other countries, could overload a refugee system. From 2012 to 2020, the number of Chinese asylum claimants increased from 15,362 to 107,864. From mid-2020 to the middle of last year, about 90,000 people left Hong Kong, the highest population loss since 2003.
However, the events leading to big inflows of refugees can occur without warning. Taiwan would need a toolbox of measures to use under such circumstances. For example, it could turn to Japan, perhaps the most “closed” country to refugees in Asia.
Even though Japan only approved 47 out of 3,936 petitions for refugee status in 2020, it has so far accepted more than 400 Ukrainians, and they do not appear to be pressuring the Japanese refugee system.
The Taiwanese government has been proud of its reputation as a human rights leader in Asia. If Taiwan raised its human rights standards to meet those of the rest of the world, it would demonstrate that it can be a global leader in the protection of such rights, reinforcing the idea that human rights are universal.
Taiwan should maintain a reasonable distance from the Hong Kong independence question, provide substantial support to political refugees and take legislative steps to establish asylum-seeking procedures.
If Taiwan is not well-prepared, refugees could be left open to mistreatment.
Refugees often face prejudice and discrimination in the places they arrive. A mechanism for locals and refugees to exchange ideas is needed, such as language and cultural programs for refugees, and cultural exchanges between locals and refugees.
Laws to protect female refugees would also be required. A man was arrested in Poland for allegedly raping a 19-year-old woman who fled Ukraine. Experts warn that the escalating refugee crisis could lead to sexual exploitation and human trafficking.
Embracing refugees is not only a humanitarian and legal commitment, but also an investment with many returns. As laborers, innovators, entrepreneurs, taxpayers, consumers and investors, refugees can contribute economically to the nations receiving them. Helping refugees can lead to job creation, increases in worker productivity and wages, and higher capital returns. It can also stimulate international commerce and investment, while promoting innovation, business and growth.
Ukraine and Taiwan have long grappled with the threats of authoritarian neighbors, while sharing the common values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. The war in Ukraine has demonstrated to the world how critical it is for democracies to stand united against authoritarian aggression.
Taiwan must resolve its asylum issues and show the world that it cherishes liberal and humanitarian values. Taiwan assuming a leading role in promoting human rights in Asia would be a milestone, and help it gain support from like-minded democracies.
Mai Shimajiri is a research assistant at the Taiwan NextGen Foundation.
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
China’s AI ecosystem has one defining difference from Silicon Valley: It is embrace of open source. While the US’ biggest companies race to build ever more powerful systems and insist only they can control them, Chinese labs have been giving the technology away for free. Open source — making a model available for anyone to use, download and build on — once seemed a niche, nerdy topic that no one besides developers cared about. However, when a new technology is driving trillions of dollars of investments and leading to immense concentrations of power, it offered an antidote. That is part of
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
RSS