On Saturday last week, the Chinese state-run Global Times ran an article titled “What else can Taiwanese eat?” about rising food prices. Using egg prices as its main example, the article said the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government was letting Taiwanese suffer, while doing nothing to curb the problem.
Interestingly, the article quoted Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康): “With nearly every commodity on the rise, what else can Taiwanese eat?”
Jaw had earlier written the statement on Facebook in a post in which he accused Council of Agriculture Minister Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲) of failing to set measures to control food prices.
Many Taiwanese, including celebrities, have taken to the Internet to “hit back” at the article, posting mouthwatering pictures of food, and commenting about what people in Shanghai were having for dinner.
Even though the article is an obvious ploy to divert attention from the Shanghai lockdown, it sheds light on the character and manipulative nature of Jaw, the leading figure of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) “blue fighters” faction. With his comment, Jaw is trying to present himself as a “common” Taiwanese, standing with the people. His criticism was meant to underscore the supposed ineptitude of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration and the possibility that Taiwanese might soon struggle to feed themselves.
However, Jaw has brushed aside reports that rising food prices are a global phenomenon. With the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, food prices have skyrocketed worldwide. The US consumer price index shows inflation there at 8.5 percent, while Taiwan’s index shows inflation at 3.27 percent.
Jaw appears to be unaware that he is being exploited by the Global Times. In using his comment, Beijing is attempting to ridicule and paint a contrasting, albeit false, picture of Taiwan compared with China. Meant to alleviate lockdown frustration at home, the article backfired, exposing the gaping difference between the situation across the Taiwan Strait: one in which hungry people are forced to buy food at 30 times higher than pre-lockdown prices, and one where people are struggling to choose what to eat next.
Since the KMT’s Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) lost the presidential election to Tsai in 2020, the party has been rallying behind the blue fighters faction, with Jaw as its champion. From the faction’s vehement opposition to allowing imports of US pork containing traces of ractopamine and food from five Japanese prefectures that were banned following the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster, to criticisms of Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) over the ministry not obtaining the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children, the blue fighters have been at odds with the government on every policy, without providing evidence or rationale for their protests.
Under Jaw’s “leadership,” the KMT’s approval rating has nosedived, and it is perilously close to being surpassed by the Taiwan People’s Party. Enjoying the “deep blue” camp’s support, Jaw might not care about pushing the KMT into the abyss. Nonetheless, he should refrain from acting as a mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party and helping Beijing by directing his intellectual fire toward Taiwanese and their government.
There is no denying that an opposition party has the responsibility to supervise a ruling party, but it also needs to remain objective and truthful to retain the public’s support.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS