A group of lawmakers led by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) have proposed amending existing legislation so that political parties funded by, or acting as proxies for, hostile foreign powers can be dissolved by court order.
The legislation in question is the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), which was passed two years ago to combat interference in Taiwan’s elections by hostile external forces — in other words, China.
The act prohibits people from making political donations to, or funding candidates running for public office on behalf of a foreign power or external entity. It also covers referendum campaigns and lobbying government officials. Those found guilty are punishable by a custodial sentence of up to five years and a fine of up to NT$10 million (US$348,371).
Is there a case to be made to support Chiu’s proposed amendment, which would furnish the executive with sweeping powers to shut down political parties if they are found to be colluding with Beijing?
Clearly, it is important to continually review laws and regulations to close any loopholes that are being exploited. Many democracies worldwide are in the process of doing so, or have already passed new legislation.
Australian counterespionage and law enforcement agencies have uncovered a number of attempts by China to influence the political system.
The Australian Senate in 2018 passed legislation that created new espionage offenses, updated sabotage offenses, introduced tougher penalties for foreign spies and established a register of foreign political agents.
Similar influence peddling operations have been uncovered in the US and the UK.
Given that Taiwan exists under the constant threat of invasion by China, the threat of espionage, including the infiltration of its political system by Chinese operatives, is a real and present danger. As such, Taiwan’s legislation and penalties might be expected to be some of the most stringent in the democratic world, but this is not the case.
The nation’s judicial system is notorious for handing down paltry fines and trifling custodial sentences to Taiwanese convicted of espionage, while most politicians do not have the will to remedy the situation. Perhaps it is a legacy of the White Terror era.
The whole focus of the democratization movement over the past four decades has been to dismantle the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) party-state apparatus. It is therefore psychologically difficult — and a political hard sell — to push in the other direction. The memory of the excesses of the authoritarian era are still fresh in the minds of many.
Nevertheless, Chinese infiltration is like rust hiding under the paintwork of an old vehicle: invisible and corrosive. If it is not identified and quickly treated, the rust will eventually eat away at every piece of metalwork on the vehicle.
Taiwan’s political and civic institutions, including schools, universities, media and religious organizations, must be protected from the corrosive effects of Chinese influence operations.
As always, the devil is in the detail. Politicians and academics must closely scrutinize the proposed legislation, remembering that laws must always be proportionate and that legislating in haste makes for bad laws.
However, a whole-of-government approach is needed to tackle the problem — legislation, on its own, would be insufficient.
The good news is that pro-China political parties are hemorrhaging support as a Taiwanese consciousness flourishes among the younger generation. Aging rabble-rousers such as China Unification Promotion Party founder Chang An-le (張安樂) and his ilk are increasingly a political irrelevance.
High-tech manufacturing in India, backed by billions of dollars in government subsidies, has attracted cheerleaders and critics. Optimists point to Apple Inc’s decision to build an alternative supply chain to hedge against China. A quarter of all iPhones now roll out of factories near Chennai, employing tens of thousands. Skeptics counter that much of this manufacturing is mere final assembly — screwdriver work that adds little value. The fact that a much smaller economy such as Vietnam exports more merchandise shows that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Make in India” initiative remains more hype than reality, they said. One way to settle
Taiwan heads to the polls next month for local elections. Beneath the campaign ads lies a deeper question: What do we call this place and who gets to decide? In the pages of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), that question has been playing out across three centuries. The entries for “Formosa” and “Taiwan” chart an island’s journey from colonial fantasy to self-named reality. Names are rarely neutral; they are the first act of possession. Nowhere is this more evident than in the OED, where the two entries serve as a linguistic seismograph for one of the world’s most enduring geopolitical fault lines.
There are two space races that the democracies must win: one to deter military campaigns near Earth, and the other to secure positional deterrence on the Moon and beyond. The good news is that the US is engaged in both races, which will also benefit US allies and partners in Asia, including Taiwan. On Sept. 14, US Air Force Secretary Troy Meink disclosed, “...the US now has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action.” No details about these “space control weapons” have yet been disclosed. However, a graphic apparently issued by French Space Command and posted
Only 107,812 babies were born in Taiwan last year, barely half the number recorded in 2016. The nation is now a super-aged society, with more than one-fifth of its population aged 65 or older. The National Development Council forecast that the population could fall from an estimated 23.2 million this year to just 12.1 million in 2075. The decline in the working-age population would be even more severe. The number of people aged 15 to 64 is projected to plunge from an estimated 15.8 million this year to 5.1 million by 2075, a reduction of about 67 percent. By then, people
RSS