At the beginning of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the media predicted a potential “decapitation strike” from Moscow. An in-depth discussion of the issue seems necessary in Taiwan.
There are many ways of launching a decapitation strike, which seeks to assinate a national leader. Such an approach was often used by the US in its conflicts, and could be a quick move for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) if it attacks Taiwan.
London’s Sunday Times on March 3 published a report headlined: “Volodymyr Zelenskiy survives three assassination attempts in days.” It said that Russia had dispatched not only troops to Ukraine but also the Kremlin-backed paramilitary Wagner Group along with Chechen special forces for decapitation strikes. Luckily, Zelenskiy escaped all three attempts.
Despite Russia’s failure to kill Zelenskiy, Ukraine must remain extremely vigilant.
“Decapitation” is a military term for the use of ballistic and precision-guided missiles to assassinate a national leader or destroy a presidential office, to demoralize and severely weaken an enemy.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has repeatedly held military exercises at its Zhurihe Training Base in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, during which it used a scale replica of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei to simulate a decapitation strike.
Russia has the world’s second-most powerful military, with state-of-the-art satellite systems, advanced weapons and the latest hypersonic missiles. It would not be difficult for Moscow to conduct a decapitation strike against Kyiv through an air raid, as the target and location of the strike are clear and definite.
It has also been reported that Zelenskiy has not left his office since the war’s outbreak late last month.
Take for example the third day of Russia’s invasion on Feb. 26, when it launched missile attacks on Ukrainian military facilities and major cities. Zelenskiy appeared in the plaza in front of the presidential office and filmed himself vowing to defend his country to the death.
It is evident that the Ukrainian presidential office, which holds significant symbolic meaning for Ukrainians, is not the first choice or locked target of Russian attacks. Otherwise, as Russia is capable of firing hundreds of missiles to destroy military bases across Ukraine, it is surely capable of destroying the building where the Ukrainian president works.
Avoiding Zelenskiy’s death or the destruction of the Ukrainian presidential office is the result of international factors external of Russia and internal political pressure. As Russian President Vladimir Putin continues the so-called “special military operation,” his strategy is to use war to force Ukraine to the negotiation table, not eradicate the country.
The purpose of Russia’s supposed decapitation attempts was to hijack Zelenskiy, not assassinate him, but as tension mounts during a continued war, whether Russia attempts other decapitation methods is a possibility.
In Taiwan’s 2020 Han Kuang exercises, the military simulated strikes against PLA and Chinese secret agents targeting the Presidential Office Building and other central government agencies in Taipei’s Boai Special Zone (博愛特區), while training for countermeasures against the CCP’s hijacking of the Taiwanese president. From the situation in the Russia-Ukraine war, the scenario set in the Han Kuang military drill is not impossible.
Yao Chung-yuan is a professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS