The Ministry of Labor on Feb. 17 announced a new path to permanent residency for migrant workers and foreign students who earn degrees in Taiwan. Workforce Development Agency Director-General Tsai Meng-liang (蔡孟良) said that the program, which is to take effect next month, is aimed at relieving Taiwan’s shortage of “intermediate skilled workers,” which was as high as 131,000 last year, the Central News Agency reported on the day of the announcement. It might also have helped eliminate one of the most egregious injustices faced by migrant workers in Taiwan: a requirement to leave after 12 years of working here.
The scheme is unlikely to achieve either of the goals. To be eligible, graduates must earn NT$50,500 per month within five years of finding employment — higher than the nation’s average regular monthly salary of NT$42,498 as reported by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics last year. Under the program, live-in caregivers must earn a minimum of NT$24,000 per month, and migrant workers in the production, construction, agriculture and fisheries industries must earn NT$33,000 per month.
A Taiwan News report published on Jan. 26 last year cited a ministry survey as showing that the average monthly salary of a caregiver was NT$19,918, and NT$28,583 for a migrant worker. It also cited caregivers as reporting an average of 10.5 work hours per day.
The conditions of the new residency scheme are simply unreachable for the majority of those it is aimed at helping. Is the ministry taking the issue seriously? It should be, given that — as Tsai said during the program’s announcement — Japan and Singapore are vying with Taiwan for foreign workers, and those countries offer more competitive salaries.
Anyone who works in Taiwan for 12 years should be allowed to stay regardless of their salary. Canada — which is also struggling with a declining birthrate and aging population — last year announced plans to grant permanent residency to 401,000 immigrants. Toward that end, it granted residency to 30,000 temporary foreign workers in essential occupations, including caregivers, who were eligible if they had “one year of full-time work experience, or the equivalent part-time experience (1,560 hours) in Canada ... in the three years preceding the application date,” regardless of salary.
Salary requirements might ensure that applicants can support themselves and not become a burden on social assistance programs, but 12 years of living and working in Taiwan should be sufficient to demonstrate an applicant’s ability to do so.
If a caregiver fails to earn at least NT$24,000 per month, or a migrant worker NT$33,000, the blame might well be partly on the state because it has failed to protect their labor rights.
A US Department of State report last year said that migrant workers in Taiwan are generally exploited, and foreign fishers working for Taiwanese employers are commonly subjected to poor working conditions.
The ministry should focus on ameliorating conditions for migrant workers, which should include raising their wages, ensuring they have sufficient time for rest and giving them attainable paths to permanent residency. Taiwan needs foreign workers more than those workers need Taiwan, so it is in the nation’s best interests to be an attractive immigration destination. Canada and other nations learned this a long time ago.
Taiwan has been called a “beacon of democracy” in East Asia, so it seems inappropriate for it to be associated with harsh conditions for migrant workers. Japan has long been resistant to embracing migrant workers as a solution to its birthrate and population woes, so Taiwan has an opportunity to be an example for Japan on these issues — just as it has been with marriage equality.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997. As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon
RSS