Taiwanese manufacturers, especially chipmakers and electronics assemblers, have long touted themselves as their customers’ best partners and suppliers, given their resourceful workforces and flexible manufacturing capacity. They once again proved their ability to perform well by overcoming geopolitical tensions and COVID-19 restrictions, as reflected in last month’s export orders, which grew at a more rapid pace than industry insiders predicted.
Taiwan’s exports expanded for a 24th consecutive month to US$51.56 billion last month — the best February figure ever. That represented growth of 21 percent from the same period a year earlier, beating an estimate of 9 percent by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. The growth was supported by robust demand, primarily for smartphones, notebook computers and chips used in 5G smartphones, high-performance computers and vehicles.
Nearly 51 percent of goods sold in Taiwan were produced at factories overseas last month, up 1.6 percentage points from a year earlier, while more than 90 percent of smartphones and electronics were produced overseas, ministry statistics showed.
To ensure growth momentum and satisfy customer demand, some major electronics companies, mainly chipmakers, are accelerating investment in manufacturing facilities in Europe and Southeast Asia to protect against possible production and supply disruptions caused by geopolitical tensions.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, a major iPhone assembler, said that it expects the most recent lockdown order by the Shenzhen City Government to have a limited effect on business as it is allocating manufacturing capacity elsewhere.
Compal Electronics Inc, the world’s No. 2 contract notebook computer maker, also expects minimal disruption as it operates other major manufacturing sites in China. Compal is also building new manufacturing capacity in Vietnam, which presently contributes up to 20 percent of its total capacity.
With global demand rising and transportation costs soaring, silicon wafer supplier GlobalWafers Inc last week said that it would build a new 12-inch wafer manufacturing fab in Italy for about NT$55 billion (US$1.93 billion), with the aim of supplying chips to its European customers, most likely German vehicle chip suppliers. As the world’s third-largest silicon wafer supplier, it also plans to spend NT$45 billion on expanding capacity at manufacturing sites in Taiwan and overseas.
United Microelectronics Co (UMC), the world’s No. 3 foundry contract chipmaker, said it plans to spend US$5 billion on a new production facility in Singapore to make 22-nanometer chips amid unresolved supply chain constraints caused by robust demand for 5G applications, Internet-of-Things devices and vehicles. It is UMC’s first major investment in Singapore in about 20 years. Speculation swirled yesterday that UMC was considering whether to build a new factory in US vehicle manufacturing hub Detroit to make chips for vehicles, and participate in Washington’s policy to boost US semiconductor self-sufficiency. If it did so, it would follow in the path of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.
Despite new overseas capacity being planned, local manufacturers are still faced with rising uncertainty and mounting risks of raw material supply constraints, along with surges in transportation costs. Ukraine supplies 40 percent of the world’s neon, and a ninefold increase in neon prices has been caused by the war. The unresolved chip crunch could worsen if neon supply becomes tight. High inflation is also likely to dampen consumers’ demand for electronics and non-essential items.
It seems that local companies dealing with an ever-changing world is the new norm, as they juggle between customer demand and supply chain constraints.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS