Taiwanese manufacturers, especially chipmakers and electronics assemblers, have long touted themselves as their customers’ best partners and suppliers, given their resourceful workforces and flexible manufacturing capacity. They once again proved their ability to perform well by overcoming geopolitical tensions and COVID-19 restrictions, as reflected in last month’s export orders, which grew at a more rapid pace than industry insiders predicted.
Taiwan’s exports expanded for a 24th consecutive month to US$51.56 billion last month — the best February figure ever. That represented growth of 21 percent from the same period a year earlier, beating an estimate of 9 percent by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. The growth was supported by robust demand, primarily for smartphones, notebook computers and chips used in 5G smartphones, high-performance computers and vehicles.
Nearly 51 percent of goods sold in Taiwan were produced at factories overseas last month, up 1.6 percentage points from a year earlier, while more than 90 percent of smartphones and electronics were produced overseas, ministry statistics showed.
To ensure growth momentum and satisfy customer demand, some major electronics companies, mainly chipmakers, are accelerating investment in manufacturing facilities in Europe and Southeast Asia to protect against possible production and supply disruptions caused by geopolitical tensions.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, a major iPhone assembler, said that it expects the most recent lockdown order by the Shenzhen City Government to have a limited effect on business as it is allocating manufacturing capacity elsewhere.
Compal Electronics Inc, the world’s No. 2 contract notebook computer maker, also expects minimal disruption as it operates other major manufacturing sites in China. Compal is also building new manufacturing capacity in Vietnam, which presently contributes up to 20 percent of its total capacity.
With global demand rising and transportation costs soaring, silicon wafer supplier GlobalWafers Inc last week said that it would build a new 12-inch wafer manufacturing fab in Italy for about NT$55 billion (US$1.93 billion), with the aim of supplying chips to its European customers, most likely German vehicle chip suppliers. As the world’s third-largest silicon wafer supplier, it also plans to spend NT$45 billion on expanding capacity at manufacturing sites in Taiwan and overseas.
United Microelectronics Co (UMC), the world’s No. 3 foundry contract chipmaker, said it plans to spend US$5 billion on a new production facility in Singapore to make 22-nanometer chips amid unresolved supply chain constraints caused by robust demand for 5G applications, Internet-of-Things devices and vehicles. It is UMC’s first major investment in Singapore in about 20 years. Speculation swirled yesterday that UMC was considering whether to build a new factory in US vehicle manufacturing hub Detroit to make chips for vehicles, and participate in Washington’s policy to boost US semiconductor self-sufficiency. If it did so, it would follow in the path of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.
Despite new overseas capacity being planned, local manufacturers are still faced with rising uncertainty and mounting risks of raw material supply constraints, along with surges in transportation costs. Ukraine supplies 40 percent of the world’s neon, and a ninefold increase in neon prices has been caused by the war. The unresolved chip crunch could worsen if neon supply becomes tight. High inflation is also likely to dampen consumers’ demand for electronics and non-essential items.
It seems that local companies dealing with an ever-changing world is the new norm, as they juggle between customer demand and supply chain constraints.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of