Ukrainians have been putting up fierce resistance to Russia’s invasion, demonstrating their valor and dignity to the world.
With NATO and the US holding back their troops, Russian President Vladimir Putin had thought he could quickly seize Ukraine by means of superior military force.
Reports of the bravery of Ukrainian soldiers holding off an attack on Snake Island, also known as Zmiinyi Island, bolstered their resolve to defend their country, thereby creating new challenges for Russian troops.
Aside from their united resolve, Ukrainians’ ability to repel Russia’s invasion has much to do with their extensive weapons training. Consequently, when the Ukrainian government distributed guns to those who were willing to take up arms against Russia, citizens immediately formed a unit of force.
As China has never been shy of showing its expansionist tendency, there might come a time when Taiwan has no choice but to enter into war. Rather than be caught unaware, Taiwan should prepare.
As military conscription and length of service cannot be reformed at short notice, and as arms procurement and developing one’s own artillery takes time, Taiwan’s priority should be training reserve soldiers and cultivating citizens’ immediate combat capabilities.
In simple terms, Taiwan should focus on training citizens at regular intervals to use modern weapons. The goal should be for citizens to know how to fire different weapons and how to deter an enemy. This policy should be implemented immediately.
The Ukrainian government has no qualms about distributing guns to its citizens because they possess the knowledge and skills to use them.
However, because of strict arms control laws, most Taiwanese have not even seen a gun, let alone handled one.
If the government does not train its citizens how to use modern weapons, there would not be much sense in handing weapons to those who are willing to take up arms for their country.
Teaching citizens how to use modern weapons is a most important step in Taiwan’s preparation for war.
Lai Hsin-yang is an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Chinese Literature at National Taipei University.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS