Russia’s senseless invasion of Ukraine has forced the world to take sides, exposing the convictions of everyone from nation states to individuals. Democratic countries and their citizens have been enthusiastic in their support for Ukraine and unequivocal in espousing their liberal convictions, while others, such as China, have been hedging their bets or defending the Kremlin’s actions.
As foot soldiers in the economic war against Russia, companies are also expected to step up. Asustek Computer Inc has learned this the hard way, as pressure grows on the firm to sever its ties with Russia.
In a letter addressed to Asustek chairman Jonney Shih (施崇棠) that was posted to Twitter on Thursday last week, Ukrainian Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov formally requested that the Taipei-based firm stop doing business in Russia until “the Russian aggression in Ukraine is fully stopped and fair order is restored.”
“Russians have no moral right to use your brilliant technology! It’s for peace, not for war!” he said in an accompanying Twitter message, one of dozens the digital minister has been making to pressure multinationals into intensifying existing sanctions.
Asustek yesterday said that logistics and banking issues have brought its Russian shipments to a standstill, and that it would donate NT$30 million (US$1.05 million) to Ukrainian assistance, adding that it “would pay close attention to any new developments,” stopping short of severing ties with the market.
Those in the business world are finding that refusing to declare a position is now understood as taking a stance, especially in a situation with stakes this high. Dodging the question has also become impossible, as the public can now deluge a company with social media criticism when it refuses to engage.
Pressure on Asustek to pull out of Russia has only increased since Fedorov’s initial Twitter message.
Asked about the issue at a legislative hearing yesterday, Minister of Economic Affairs Wang Mei-hua (王美花) said it was her understanding that Asustek would “consider an evacuation” from the Russian market. She cited concern about its reputation, but declined to comment further.
The pressure is unlikely to dissipate soon, especially with so many people ready to call out companies trying to have it both ways.
Especially as a Taiwanese company, Asustek has a responsibility to stand up for the democratic values that have made its success possible. Pulling out of the Russian market would result in a loss of less than 5 percent of its notebook sales, according to an estimate from a local investment consultant, while the move could have a significant effect on the Russian economy, given that 29 percent of Russian respondents to a Statista survey last year said that their household uses an Asus laptop.
Taiwanese and the government were quick to show their support for Ukraine. Sanctions announced late last month shortly after the invasion began earned Taiwan a spot on Russia’s “unfriendly list,” while Taiwanese as of Friday had donated NT$521.98 million to assist Ukrainian refugees.
It is time for companies still on the sidelines to enthusiastically join this united front and show the world that all of Taiwan’s society is committed to the values that set it apart from its bellicose neighbor, even if it would hurt their bottom lines. After all, if Taiwan is one day at the epicenter of conflict, hopefully the world would decide to help rather than pinch pennies.
As Vice President William Lai (賴清德) said last week, if Taiwan is a bystander in Ukraine’s war, why would other countries support Taiwan?
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
RSS