The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not ruled out cooperating with other opposition parties in the local elections in November, especially in districts that are difficult to win, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said on Friday. The KMT might not even nominate a mayoral candidate in Kaohsiung, he added.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), said he had not talked to Chu about the issue, and that the scope of the KMT’s intended cooperation remains unclear.
Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), a prominent KMT member, a day earlier wrote on Facebook that he was inspired by the result of South Korea’s presidential election on Wednesday, citing a candidate who dropped out of the race to endorse the candidate who went on to win. Taiwan’s opposition parties should also unite and “remove” the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), he said, adding that defeating the DPP would be more important than individual opposition parties’ gains.
Since a political party affiliation poll in October last year for the first time showed the TPP, at 17.6 percent, ahead of the KMT, at 16.2 percent, trailing the DPP at 27.1 percent, KMT members have been calling on their party to join forces with the TPP.
Former KMT vice chairman Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) last month urged his party and the TPP to cooperate in November, as the TPP’s potential candidate in the capital, Taipei Deputy Mayor Vivian Huang (黃珊珊), might spoil KMT Legislator Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安), chances of winning if she also ran.
However, Huang said the KMT only sees its own benefit when calling for cooperation with the TPP, adding that the KMT would have won Taipei’s most recent local election if it had done a better job.
A poll released last week showed Chiang 1 percentage point ahead of the DPP’s potential candidate, Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), while Huang was 6 to 7 percentage points behind. It also showed that 52.1 percent of respondents said the KMT and TPP should have their own candidates, while 25.9 percent favored a joint candidate.
Chiang on Friday dismissed the idea of KMT-TPP cooperation, saying that the public might see it as a quid pro quo and it could lead to a decline in support for both parties.
KMT Legisator Fu Kun-chi on Thursday also ruled out cooperating with the TPP, saying that his party would nominate candidates in all districts, including in DPP strongholds in the south. Fu said Ko cooperated with the DPP ahead of his 2014 election victory, when Ko described his political stance as “deep-green,” and the TPP still regularly voted with the DPP in the legislature.
Cooperation with the DPP ended before Ko’s re-election in 2018, and his more recent remarks, including that the “two sides of the [Taiwan] Strait are one family,” suggest he has moved closer to the KMT.
The four items promoted by the KMT lost in a referendum in December last year, its candidate lost a by-election in Taichung’s second electoral district in January and it failed in its campaign to recall independent Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐) in Taipei. Showing signs of internal disagreement, the KMT might doubt that it can win on its own, but the TPP seems uninterested in helping. Calls for unity within the KMT have not stopped the infighting over leadership roles and political positions.
Recent polls show the TPP gaining support, but it remains to be seen whether that will translate into votes in November. Ko continuing to play a central role in his party, despite having ambiguous positions on policies including Taiwan’s international relations, might weigh on the TPP.
The KMT and the TPP might need to develop clearer positions before they can see whether they can cooperate. Wanting to “remove the DPP” might be the only consensus they can find.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS