As the war in Ukraine entered its 15th day yesterday, an alliance of Western nations led by the US and a number of Asian countries was punishing Moscow.
In addition to levying sanctions against Russia, NATO has provided Ukraine with assistance, mainly in the form of military equipment, such as US-made FGM-148 Javelin shoulder-fired anti-tank missiles and FIM-92 Stinger shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles.
The weapons have enabled Ukrainian armed forces to fight back against the Russian military. Taiwan’s military has also acquired such missiles.
In 1998, the Ministry of National Defense purchased more than 700 Stinger air-defense missiles, and in 2001 purchased at least 360 Javelin anti-tank missiles from the US.
Stinger missiles can take down enemy helicopters and uncrewed aerial drones. They were used with devastating effect against Soviet military helicopters during the Soviet-Afghan War, when the CIA covertly supplied mujahidin fighters with the weapons.
With the balance in the Taiwan Strait tipped considerably in China’s favor, it is likely that Stingers would play an important role in enhancing the military’s asymmetric air-defense capabilities.
As for the Javelin, it is a heavy-duty “fire-and-forget” anti-tank missile that can destroy modern tanks and armored vehicles with a single hit.
The military purchased the weapons to complement its other anti-tank capabilities, which include, but are not limited to, the BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile and AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-surface missile.
The Javelin effectively bolsters the military’s anti-tank and land warfare defenses.
Stingers and Javelins are proving to be extremely effective weapons on the battlefield in Ukraine, validating the ministry’s procurement in terms of their performance.
Taiwan’s asymmetric warfighting capabilities would be significantly enhanced by these two battle-tested weapons.
That Ukraine continues to resist the Russian military is in no small part due to the high morale and iron will of its people, but the military support provided by NATO is no less a decisive factor.
While Ukraine and Taiwan are different countries, there are points of similarity.
Taiwan faces a rapidly growing Chinese People’s Liberation Army, and while the military can and should continue to make appropriate preparations and weapons purchases, the support and determination of all Taiwanese to defend the nation is equally crucial.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS