As the war in Ukraine entered its 15th day yesterday, an alliance of Western nations led by the US and a number of Asian countries was punishing Moscow.
In addition to levying sanctions against Russia, NATO has provided Ukraine with assistance, mainly in the form of military equipment, such as US-made FGM-148 Javelin shoulder-fired anti-tank missiles and FIM-92 Stinger shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles.
The weapons have enabled Ukrainian armed forces to fight back against the Russian military. Taiwan’s military has also acquired such missiles.
In 1998, the Ministry of National Defense purchased more than 700 Stinger air-defense missiles, and in 2001 purchased at least 360 Javelin anti-tank missiles from the US.
Stinger missiles can take down enemy helicopters and uncrewed aerial drones. They were used with devastating effect against Soviet military helicopters during the Soviet-Afghan War, when the CIA covertly supplied mujahidin fighters with the weapons.
With the balance in the Taiwan Strait tipped considerably in China’s favor, it is likely that Stingers would play an important role in enhancing the military’s asymmetric air-defense capabilities.
As for the Javelin, it is a heavy-duty “fire-and-forget” anti-tank missile that can destroy modern tanks and armored vehicles with a single hit.
The military purchased the weapons to complement its other anti-tank capabilities, which include, but are not limited to, the BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile and AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-surface missile.
The Javelin effectively bolsters the military’s anti-tank and land warfare defenses.
Stingers and Javelins are proving to be extremely effective weapons on the battlefield in Ukraine, validating the ministry’s procurement in terms of their performance.
Taiwan’s asymmetric warfighting capabilities would be significantly enhanced by these two battle-tested weapons.
That Ukraine continues to resist the Russian military is in no small part due to the high morale and iron will of its people, but the military support provided by NATO is no less a decisive factor.
While Ukraine and Taiwan are different countries, there are points of similarity.
Taiwan faces a rapidly growing Chinese People’s Liberation Army, and while the military can and should continue to make appropriate preparations and weapons purchases, the support and determination of all Taiwanese to defend the nation is equally crucial.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Edward Jones
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS