Media reports that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is recruiting business intelligence analysts have critics saying that local universities’ political science departments would be hard pressed to produce such talent. Their opinions are not unfounded, and it has led me to think about what is amiss in the nation’s political science education.
Based on my 14 years of observation, local political science departments are too focused on publishing papers and analyzing issues, instead of teaching students to think about counterstrategies.
The main goal of political science is to develop students into statespeople or strategists, but the local education system seems to be focused on training students to analyze situations, rather than providing solutions to “what should we do if we were in this situation?”
For example, in the case of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, professors would be offering various in-depth analyses of the issue in class, placing a lot of scope on the background information of the two countries.
However, situational analysis is merely the starting point. If training is only focused on this aspect, students would be conducting data collection, and spending invaluable time and effort on information that many have access to.
This is the reason why most Taiwanese do not think much of political science majors, with many considering politics a topic that even a taxi driver can offer their two cents on.
The most important trait of a strategist or statesperson is the ability to come up with counterstrategies.
Taiwanese education lacks the facility to train students to think critically: If we were in this situation, what should we do and what should be our next move? This is one of the reasons we have been missing out on great opportunities to boost our international profile.
Take Taiwan and India, for example: We have missed the opportunity to exchange maximum benefits with India and reap concrete benefits from them.
A small country has every possibility to stand up to a big country, as long as it has talented strategists. That is why Ukraine has the means to deter a Russian invasion. Just like the Three Kingdoms period, the warlord Liu Bei’s (劉備) camp was originally the weakest among the three. However, with the help of the brilliant military strategist Zhuge Liang (諸葛亮) by his side, he soon built up a kingdom strong enough to contend with the other two.
Jason Lee has a doctorate in international politics from National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Rita Wang
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
RSS