The nation’s economy expanded 4.88 percent in the fourth quarter of last year, bringing the year’s GDP growth to 6.28 percent, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics reported late last month. The growth was the fastest annual increase since 2011, indicating that the economy maintained its resilience amid the COVID-19 pandemic and swiftly rebounded from the nation’s worst local outbreak in May. The biggest challenge this year is meeting last year’s high comparison base.
The nation’s growth momentum surprisingly accelerated after GDP expanded 3.11 percent in 2020, due to robust exports and domestic investments. It was a commendable performance for Taiwan in comparison with other “Asian Tigers.” South Korea’s economy in 2020 contracted for the first time in 22 years amid the pandemic, shrinking 1 percent from a year earlier, but it last year expanded 4 percent, its fastest pace in 11 years, on the back of soaring exports and increased construction activity.
Singapore’s economy grew 7.2 percent last year, after shrinking 5.4 percent in 2020, while Hong Kong’s GDP expanded 6.4 percent, reversing two previous years of annual contraction as its economy was also battered by the pandemic. While their growth benefited from improved export performance and private consumption, the rise was boosted by a low comparison base.
Taiwan’s exports, stock prices, currency and housing prices reached their highest levels in three years. Even though sustained global demand for semiconductors, and large domestic investments in machinery and industrial materials would continue to underpin the nation’s manufacturing and exports outlook this year, last year’s high comparison base would likely limit potential growth.
The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 and the government’s cautious approach to containing local infections might also renew pressure on economic activity and hamper a greater rebound in demand. The Omicron variant is creating obstacles worldwide, with the global economy in a weaker position than previously expected, according to the IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook report released last month. As Taiwan is an export-reliant economy, the risk of shrinking global demand and other developments in the external environment warrant the nation’s attention.
While Taiwan’s headline consumer price index averaged 1.96 percent last year and the core inflation measure — which excludes fruits, vegetables and energy — was relatively subdued at 1.33 percent, the gauges were already at their highest since 2009. Other uncertainties, such as geopolitical tensions, price increases in some major economies and persistent supply chain bottlenecks amid the evolving pandemic, could lead to major central banks tightening monetary policy — and Taiwan is no exception.
The minutes of the central bank’s December policy meeting showed that discussions had started to focus on whether the bank should raise interest rates at its next quarterly board meeting — which is scheduled for March 17, shortly after the US Federal Open Market Committee’s policy meeting on March 15 and 16 — should inflationary pressure continue to intensify, although board members worried about greater capital inflows into the property market if it starts raising interest rates too soon.
Taiwan’s manufacturing sector is to remain one of the key pillars of the economy this year on the back of robust global demand. It is too early to evaluate the potential effects of the Omicron variant on the nation’s exports and economic outlook, but a high comparison base last year and the ongoing supply bottlenecks might contribute to a moderate growth this year.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS