The results of the by-election in Taichung’s second electoral district and the recall vote against independent Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐) were announced on Jan. 9 — two home runs for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and nothing for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Meanwhile, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) has called for an end to ideological labeling to mitigate the antagonism between the pan-green and pan-blue camps.
The two camps should refrain from proclaiming themselves winners or their rivals losers in upcoming elections.
The “pendulum effect” often describes voting behavior. A party that claims a landslide victory might suffer an electoral defeat next time around as voter sympathy favors an underdog or they seek to prevent one side from gaining too much power. The bigger the margin of victory, the more likely the pendulum effect.
Since Taiwan Statebuilding Party legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) was recalled, prompting the Taichung by-election, the DPP has been on a winning streak, emerging on top with the results of four referendums, the Taichung vote and the failure of Lim’s recall in Taipei’s fifth electoral district.
Whether the pendulum effect comes into play depends on how the DPP responds to its victories. If it keeps associating the victories with localist ideologies such as Taiwanese values — safeguarding Taiwan, prevailing justice or the “friend or foe” principle — it runs the risk of the pendulum swinging in the buildup to the local elections in November.
The effect takes place when there are opposing forces — the greater the polarity, the bigger the swing.
A classic example is the 2008 US presidential election. Americans elected their first black president, but eight years later replaced him with the most conservative president in recent history.
There are always people who are at odds with mainstream narratives and independent voters use their ballots to prevent the country from turning into a state dominated by one party.
Therefore, the more the DPP says that its victories were the result of a superior ideology, the more voter antipathy and aversion it might generate.
It should also refrain from using “us and them” rhetoric. Adopting narratives that reduce political polarization might limit the pendulum effect.
For the past few years, Taiwanese have seen fewer KMT politicians graciously accepting defeat. After this month’s by-election and recall attempt, the KMT blamed its defeats on the “state apparatus,” saying it robbed Taiwanese of their freedom and wills.
The KMT attempted to evade responsibility by disparaging opponents and inciting hatred for the DPP, tactics that do not maintain morale for long.
After a defeat, conceding and congratulating the opponent is more than a gracious act, it shows respect to voters. To blame defeat on an opponent pushes swing voters away.
The KMT should try to rebuild its image using policies and qualified candidates instead of fighting the DPP on ideological issues.
As for the TPP, its call to cease political labeling might seem reasonable, but it needs to be coupled with action.
TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) habit of calling opponents “1450,” or cyberarmy members, shows that the party’s actions do not match its words.
The TPP might be seeking to woo people who are tired of politics after a packed agenda of recalls, referendums and the by-election, but it should work on substantial political narratives, and not rely on excoriating the DPP and the KMT to draw attention to itself.
“Humble in victory, gracious in defeat” might be a cliche, but following that adage might prevent defeat. The TPP should propose initiatives and agendas so that it benefits if the DPP and KMT mobilize hatred and outrage.
Chang Yueh-han is an assistant professor of journalism at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Rita Wang
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS