Should high-school graduates bypass university if they are not academically oriented? The idea was suggested in these pages in an op-ed on Tuesday (“Consider pursuing a degree with discretion,” page 8). The author, high-school teacher Lin Cheng-wu (林政武), said that for many students, “vocational education might suit them far better than a college degree.”
I relate to that sentiment. I shunned university after I realized in my late teens that I did not have such a scholarly mind. I was a straight-A student in arts courses such as drama, creative writing and photography, but the only academic subject I excelled in was English.
Instead of going to university, I went to a vocational college for a two-year broadcasting certificate.
However, I nonetheless recommend that students today aim for a degree and find a way to make university enjoyable.
After receiving my certificate, I did well working in the radio division at the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. Eight years later, budget cuts and a dying radio industry left me out of work.
I took a job with the federal government, but I was stuck at the clerical level for 10 years — it was impossible to advance without a degree. I found myself nearing 40 and typing letters for managers 10 years my junior.
To break the rut, I went to Singapore to work in its lucrative publishing market. Upon returning to Canada three years later, I struggled to find any kind of work in a job market that had become shockingly competitive.
Teaching English as a second language seemed like a natural fit, so I obtained a Cambridge CELTA certification, but it was of no use — a bachelor’s degree was a basic requirement at language schools at home and abroad.
I decided to “challenge” for a master’s degree, which is when someone without a degree applies for a master’s program based on life and work experience. The practice was once accepted in the West, but has become a rarity. I had to look abroad and was fortunate to be accepted into the applied linguistics master’s program at Chung Yuan University in Taoyuan.
Throughout my life, I have seen how many doors had shut behind me. Job markets that once did not require degrees now do. Countries such as Japan and Singapore, which once freely handed out work permits to foreigners, now require advanced degrees and qualifications.
A Taiwanese high-school graduate might do fine for a decade as a carpenter or a graphic designer without a bachelor’s degree, just as I once had fruitful employment after getting my vocational certificate.
However, one never knows what curveballs could be thrown later in life: a workplace injury that requires a new career direction; a vanishing job market; a desire to live abroad. Or, such as myself, one might find that they develop academic interests later in life and wish to study for a master’s degree — which turned out to be one of my most rewarding pursuits.
I enjoyed the work my broadcasting certificate led to, but there was a trade-off — life became more difficult as times changed, and the options are narrower for today’s young people than they were for me.
There are some good careers for those who are not academically inclined, but some fields can be more of a gamble than others when entering them without a degree.
I would advise teens considering skipping university to speak with an academic counselor about ways to chase a degree with the skills and interests they possess, or take a “gap year” to pursue something interesting while thinking about higher education.
Michael Riches is a copy editor at the Taipei Times.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) said in an interview with CNN on Sunday that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would render the company’s plants inoperable, and that such a war would produce “no winners.” Not only would Taiwan’s economy be destroyed in a cross-strait conflict, but the impact “would go well beyond semiconductors, and would bring about the destruction of the world’s rules-based order and totally change the geopolitical landscape,” Liu said in the interview, according to the Central News Agency. Bloomberg columnist Hal Brands wrote on June 24: “A major war over Taiwan could create global economic
Washington’s official position on US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan is that nothing has changed: The US government says it is maintaining its “one China” policy, that Pelosi is free to arrange international trips with congressional delegations independent of the government and that she is not the first US official to visit Taiwan even this year. Yet there is no denying that the fact and the optics of the second-in-line to the US presidency speaking with lawmakers at the Legislative Yuan about inter-parliamentary discussions and learning from each other as equals are hugely significant, as were
Amid a fervor in the global media, US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her congressional delegation made a high-profile visit to Taipei. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) awarded a state honor to her at the Presidential Office. Evidently, the occasion took on the aspect of an inter-state relationship between the US and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, despite no mutual state recognition between the two. Beijing furiously condemned Pelosi’s visit in advance, with military drills in the waters surrounding coastal China to check the move. Pelosi is a well-known China hawk, and second in the line of succession to
A stark contrast in narratives about China’s future is emerging inside and outside of China. This is partly a function of the dramatic constriction in the flow of people and ideas into and out of China, owing to China’s COVID-19 quarantine requirements. There also are fewer foreign journalists in China to help the outside world make sense of developments. Those foreign journalists and diplomats who are in China often are limited in where they can travel and who they can meet. There also is tighter technological control over information inside China than at any point since the dawn of the
RSS