The dozens of Type 90, or Kyumaru, tanks rumbling through shooting drills on Japan’s northern island of Hokkaido exemplify the challenge its arms manufacturers face at home and overseas as the country fortifies its defenses against strategic threats.
The Japan Self-Defense Forces need the more advanced aircraft and weaponry sold by US arms manufacturers, as Japan’s strategic focus shifts from Russia in the north to regions in the south, where it faces incursions by Chinese fighter jets and naval vessels, along with North Korean missile launches.
Big Japanese defense manufacturers such as Mitsubishi, IHI Corp and Kawasaki Heavy Industries are struggling to sell 20th century tanks, aircraft and warships. They need to develop better technology to serve a military in the market for unmanned aircraft such as Tritons made by Northrop Grumman and Boeing’s undersea Echo Voyager.
Likewise, Japan’s international arms sales have never really taken off. Uncompetitive, with high prices, aging technology and scant government support, arms manufacturers in Japan increasingly are just withdrawing from the business.
The hefty Kyumaru tanks built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries debuted 30 years ago and are being replaced with lighter, more mobile armored vehicles that can travel on public roads or have amphibious capabilities, including US assault vehicles.
“People may think Japan has advanced technology and it can quickly catch up with others, and start selling equipment if it only gets serious, but I think that’s wrong,” said Heigo Sato, an expert on defense issues and professor at Hokkaido’s Takushoku University.
“The problem is, Japan’s defense products are not first grade. Nobody is interested in buying second or third-grade products at higher prices,” he said.
Japan created its own Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency in 2015 to energize the sluggish domestic defense industry, and to promote joint technology research, development and sales with friendly nations.
However, profits have dwindled at home, as the government, instead of promoting sales, increased big-ticket purchases from the US.
Japan is the world’s 12th-largest arms importer, with a 2.2 percent global share. Most purchases are from its ally the US, a survey by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said.
A large and growing share of the ￥2 trillion (US$17.4 billion) annually in equipment purchases by the Japanese Ministry of Defense are made through the US Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program. They more than tripled from ￥190.6 billion in 2014 to ￥701.3 billion in 2019, when Japan placed orders for F-35 stealth jets, missile interceptors and other expensive equipment to reinforce its defenses against China and North Korea.
Haggling over expensive US jets and other equipment has slowed progress on revamping the nation’s defenses, ministry officials said.
Japan has negotiated the cost of upgrading dozens of F-15 jets, which had doubled from the initial US estimate, down to ￥397 billion from ￥552 billion, they said. To cut costs, Japan switched to domestic-made shorter-range air-to-surface standoff missiles from the initial plan to use US long-range anti-ship cruise missiles, among other revisions, they said.
Army officials at the Hokkaido drills said they would take whatever equipment they can get. One official joked that his camouflage uniforms were surely still Japanese made.
Japan’s total defeat in World War II, when it tried to conquer much of Asia, has left many Japanese wary of military buildups. The post-war constitution limits use of force to self-defense, and a ban on arms exports was only lifted in 2014.
Moreover, Japanese scientists tend to be reluctant to engage in research and development of technologies that can be used for military purposes.
Since the Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Agency was launched, Japan has sold just one finished product — a surveillance radar — to the Philippines. It first gave away five used TC-90 training aircraft, along with pilot training and 40,000 parts for UH-1H multipurpose helicopters.
In 2016, a possible breakthrough sale of Soryu-class submarine technology fell through when Australia chose France to develop 12 diesel submarines. That US$65 billion contract was scuttled when Australia switched to nuclear submarines under the AUKUS pact with the UK and the US.
Negotiations to sell about a dozen US-2 ShinMaywa Industries sea planes to India have been held up by pricing disagreements. Japan’s attempts to export a radar to Thailand and frigates to Indonesia also ended unsuccessfully.
As a latecomer, Japan lacks the marketing and technology transfer expertise of the US, with its FMS program, and other major exporters.
“Japan needs to be more competitive, more assertive and also be more willing to engage with customers in the marketing and promotion of defense platforms,” Jon Grevatt, principal of Indo-Pacific research and analysis at the Janes defense intelligence agency, said at an online event.
The government and the industry have not entirely given up. Japan is developing its own long-range surface-to-air cruise missile, and as China’s military buildup extends to cyberspace and outer space, the Ministry of Defense has begun pushing for research and development of artificial intelligence-operated autonomous vehicles, supersonic flight and other “game-changing” technologies.
Experts say that Japan should accelerate work on drones, satellite constellations and technology against electronic attacks. To fund such research, the ministry requested a record ￥291 billion budget for the year beginning in April, up 38 percent from this year.
Japan is also pursuing joint development of its next-generation F-X jet with the US and the UK to replace its aging fleet of F-2s by 2035. Japan and the UK have announced plans to jointly develop a future fighter aircraft engine demonstrator, and to explore work on other air combat technologies and subsystems. The project includes Japan’s Mitsubishi and IHI, and Rolls-Royce and BAE Systems in the UK.
It is a race against time as defense contractors drop out.
Yu Yamada, a Japan Business Federation senior manager for the defense industry, said it has 60-plus member companies with defense-related operations, down by about 10 in the past few years.
Komatsu Ltd, a leading construction equipment manufacturer, stopped developing and making armored vehicles after upgrades failed to meet Japanese Ministry of Defense requirements. Komatsu, once the seventh-largest supplier, only maintains existing fleets it supplied. It still makes ammunition.
In March, Mitsui E&S Shipbuilding Co sold its warship unit to Japan’s top contractor, Mitsubishi. Daicel Corp, a major electronics and chemical material maker, and supplier of warplane ejection seats, is dropping its unprofitable defense business to put resources elsewhere.
Sumitomo Heavy Industries stopped making 5.56mm machine guns, citing a bleak long-term outlook.
If the trend continues, the military and the defense industry could face supply problems, higher costs or quality concerns, Yamada said.
“Supply chains cannot be reconstructed in just one to two years. The industry is facing a rather difficult situation,” Yamada added.
In an e-mailed statement, the Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency said that keeping a domestic defense industry base was “a challenge” as companies withdraw.
“We must ensure businesses are succeeded smoothly so that the technology of key suppliers won’t be lost in case of withdrawals,” it said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS