After six years of advocacy, negotiations and numerous preventable tragedies, Taiwan finally has an anti-stalking law. On Friday, the Legislative Yuan passed the Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act (跟蹤騷擾防制法), which makes stalking a crime that is punishable by up to five years in prison. The act takes effect in six months.
It focuses on eight major kinds of stalking and harassment behaviors that repeatedly target a person against their will, ranging from surveillance and tailing to threats, unwanted advances and Internet harassment. This list seems comprehensive enough for now, and police are empowered to launch an investigation, arrest suspects and advise a court to detain them.
While the law appears to be a step up from previous legislation, which were criticized for having definitions of “stalking” that were too specific or lacking enough preventive measures, women’s groups have still pointed out several aspects of the new law that are worrisome.
Of most concern is the “sexual or sex-related motive” clause, which was hotly debated in legislative sessions. While such motives are frequently behind stalking behavior, as seen in several high-profile cases of stalking violence in the past few years, critics say that the clause makes it easy for suspected perpetrators to simply deny that their actions had a sexual motivation.
If a stranger watches someone every day from the same spot or frequently sends seemingly innocuous messages online, but does nothing further, it could be difficult for the victim to prove that the intent is sexual or sex-related.
Time will tell how law enforcement and the justice system handle this; hopefully they will use their judgement and refrain from being “dinosaurs.”
The government and law enforcement understandably want to narrow the scope of the law because of limited resources and implementation issues, but there are alternatives to limiting it in this manner.
The law does not allow for situations in which people are stalked by someone who is angry at them, wants money from them or is prejudiced against them. There are so many nonsexual behaviors that can motivate stalkers.
The law also lacks an immediate protection mechanism for cases that could turn violent: Police issue offenders a written warning, and victims can only request a protection order if the perpetrators exhibit the behavior again within two years.
Victims often do not report incidents to the authorities until something is seriously wrong. How can law enforcement officials be sure that the perpetrator will not become furious over being reported and do something extreme to their target?
Still, stalking victims have suffered without protection for too many years. The law’s effectiveness should be closely monitored, especially the number and nature of cases dismissed because the targeted person could not prove that the stalker’s motive was sexual or sex-related.
The government should take this opportunity to educate people about their rights, and explain — especially to those afraid that the law limits their “love lives” — how people can make romantic or sexual advances while respecting people’s boundaries and obtaining consent.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS