Former representative to Thailand Lee Ying-yuan (李應元) died of cancer on Thursday last week at the age of 68. As a valiant fighter for Taiwan’s freedom and democracy, he died without regret.
Lee first joined the opposition movement under the influence of the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident. After receiving a master’s degree from National Taiwan University (NTU) in 1980, he went abroad to study in the US, where he received a master’s degree in healthcare management from Harvard University in 1981.
During his time in the US, he came to know Taiwanese revolutionaries such as Cary Hung (洪哲勝) and Kuo Bei-hung (郭倍宏). In 1982, he established the North America Taiwanese Collegian organization and in 1983 he joined the World United Formosans for Independence (WUFI), where he served as publisher of the North America Taiwanese Collegian’s magazine Taioan Hakseng/Thoivan Hoksang (Taiwan Student, 台灣學生). He went on to become secretary-general of the Taiwanese Association of America — USA and was blacklisted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government.
In 1988, Lee gained a doctorate in health economics from the University of North Carolina and became an associate professor at the University of South Dakota. The following year he was appointed to teach at NTU, but could not return to Taiwan because his name was on the KMT government’s blacklist.
In early 1990, Lee became vice chairman of the WUFI, and in July of the same year he smuggled himself back to Taiwan, where he had photographs taken of himself in various places and contributed to magazines published by the dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) opposition movement. He was arrested in September 1991, but was later released after Article 100 of the Criminal Code was repealed, thus abolishing the charge of sedition for Taiwanese independence advocates.
In 2004, then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) wanted to run for a second term. Several media polls initially showed his support lagging more than 30 percent behind the KMT.
Even within the DPP, few believed that Chen could defeat the rival pan-blue camp’s team of the KMT’s Lien Chan (連戰) and the People First Party’s James Soong (宋楚瑜).
However, Lee, under the slogan of “Yes! Taiwan,” overcame dissenting voices in the DPP headquarters. With his affable character, he shuttled among party factions and organized the massive “Hands Across Taiwan” event of Feb. 28, 2004, which was attended by more than 2 million people. The success of this event rallied the pan-green camp behind Chen’s campaign and contributed to its eventual victory.
If Chen had lost the election, Lien and Soong would have brought the KMT back to power. Lien and Soong were both friendly to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), so Taiwan might have become a second Hong Kong. The KMT and its local factions would have become unbeatable. The gap between the rich and the poor would have become ever wider, leaving no future for the young. By preventing this, it would be fair to say that Lee became Taiwan’s savior.
Lee has left us, but his spirit lives on. Like mathematics professor and democracy advocate Chen Wen-chen (陳文成), who was found dead on the NTU campus in 1981, Lee was a son of Taiwan.
Lee gave up his comfortable academic life in the US to make a risky return to his homeland. For the sake of Taiwan’s freedom and democracy, he was even ready to risk his life.
Teng Hon-yuan is an alumnus of National Taiwan University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.