Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is under fire again for making controversial comments, which is nothing new, but his behavior should still be scrutinized and addressed, as he is an elected public figure.
No matter what his reasons, his words still often set a bad example for society, especially children.
In the latest incident, Ko was questioning the Central Epidemic Command Center’s (CECC) purchase of a batch of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines that are to expire at the end of this month.
However, unhappy with Centers for Disease Control Deputy Director-General Chuang Jen-hsiang’s (莊人祥) response, Ko allegedly asked if Chuang’s IQ was below 70.
After this set off a storm in the media, the Taipei City Government tried to explain that he actually said: “Does he think my IQ is lower than 70?” and that his mask and background noise obscured his words.
This is Ko’s typical response: justifying his actions rather than addressing problems.
Ultimately, it does not matter which version is true. The former is obviously more offensive, but neither is okay. This is not a random number Ko blurted out, an IQ of below 70 is an indicator of intellectual disability. Either way, it is hurtful toward those who do score in that range, many of whom lead productive, happy lives and have their own opinions on the government.
Some might even be working for Ko at Taipei City Hall.
The comments are especially troubling as Ko, a former surgeon, often touts his IQ of 157.
However, as most highly intelligent people have learned — often the hard way — smarts do not always translate to success.
If IQ is everything, why is Ko constantly offending people?
In a society where academic prowess is still at times seen as a prime indicator of a person’s worth, comparing IQs — especially in an offhand, out-of-context remark — does not help to defy this faulty mindset.
Long gone are the days when students were assigned class numbers according to their pre-semester aptitude scores, and schools have been pushing against over-glorifying test results. Even so, a superiority complex associated with people of high intelligence remains an issue.
Ko’s behavior will not change. It has not affected his popularity much, as he was re-elected in 2018.
However, his latest outburst is still a good opportunity to teach people an important lesson. Many public figures are holding him accountable — explaining why IQ is not everything and why such remarks can be offensive.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) was among the first to sound off, saying that modern society values well-rounded human beings, not just those with high IQs.
Physician Tan Che-kim (陳志金) said that people are tired of Ko frequently mentioning his high IQ, adding that it is an indication of deep insecurity.
Hsieh Tsung-hsueh (謝宗學), another physician, shared a story about how he was almost sent to special education classes as a child, but he worked hard on his academic and public speaking skills to fulfill his goal of becoming a doctor.
As TV anchor Chang Ya-chin (張雅琴) put it: “I want to tell my audience, especially children, please do not follow Ko Wen-je’s example. When you disagree with someone, you should never question their IQ.”
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS