This weekend was the first time in 19 years that a Pride parade was not held in Taipei, as the festivities were moved online due to COVID-19 precautions. However, the spirit remained the same, as the LGBTQ community took the opportunity to remind people to respect and understand them.
There are still unresolved issues regarding LGBTQ rights after the legalization of same-sex marriage in Taiwan in 2019, including adoption rights, but there has been progress in these areas over the past year.
The first transnational same-sex couple got married in August, and in September, a transgender woman was allowed for the first time to alter the gender on her ID card without providing proof of sex reassignment surgery.
However, while government policies can change, societal attitudes toward the LGBTQ community often prove more stubborn. The Chinese-language themes of the Taiwan Trans March — now in its third year — and the Pride parade allude to this: the former called for people to “step out their prejudices and celebrate together online” (跨出偏見,異同上線), while the latter asked people to be friendly toward LGBTQ people in their everyday lives (友善日常).
As Taiwan Rainbow Civil Action Association chairman Fletcher Hong (小鯨) said before the event: “We often see areas, such as in shops or restrooms, labeled as ‘gender friendly’ spaces, but the purpose is that people can be themselves instead of having them as a place of refuge... We need to make being ‘friendly’ a part of our daily, normal lives.”
“Daily, normal life” can range from interactions with family members — especially regarding coming out — and how people look at LGBTQ people in public, to microaggressions and other uncomfortable situations or inconveniences they might encounter at school or in the workplace.
Often these are not acts of overt discrimination, but instead transgressions stemming from a glaring lack of awareness that pervades Taiwanese society regarding not just the LGBTQ community, but all of the nation’s minorities.
However, these groups are no longer staying silent.
The numbers support the association’s pleas. For example, a poll by Hotels.com showed that one-third of LGBTQ travelers to Taiwan have refrained from certain behaviors to avoid attention, while 43 percent felt obliged to tone down their interaction with their partner or to disguise their relationship in public. When they did show affection, 32 percent said they were stared at by hotel staff. The same percentage said they were prevented from using some hotel facilities due to their sexual orientation.
These do not mean LGBTQ rights have not improved at all in Taiwan — the same poll shows that more than 70 percent of travelers felt more confident and safe to disclose their gender identity or sexual orientation compared with three years ago.
However, progress should not stop there. A pair of articles on Womany.com last month featured lesbians who were faced with bias or were asked uncomfortable questions at urologists and ob-gyns.
Again, this likely comes from a lack of awareness and understanding of same-sex sexual behavior on the physicians’ part, but it is one of the many little things in everyday life that LGBTQ people have to deal with — and gender-normative people do not.
This sort of change takes time even after the laws are changed, but that is exactly why these issues should be continuously emphasized.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s