Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, has committed to ending planet-warming emissions by 2060, but made clear that the new plan would not work if the country is stopped from continuing to pump millions of barrels per day for decades.
It is “an aim that enables us to say to the world: We are with you. We share the same concern. We want to evolve,” Saudi Arabian Minister of Energy Abdulaziz bin Salman said.
The country would take a “holistic and technological” approach in meeting the target, he added.
Illustration: Mountain People
The announcement might prove to be a boost for the COP26 climate summit that starts in Glasgow, Scotland, on Sunday, even as experts raise questions about the credibility of the goals set by the fossil-fuel giant.
The world “cannot operate without fossil fuels, without hydrocarbons, without renewables ... none of these things will be the savior,” bin Salman told the Saudi Green Initiative Forum. “It has to be a comprehensive solution.”
In global talks, such as G20 meetings or COP summits, Saudi Arabia often pushed for ensuring that fossil fuels have a longer-lasting role in the energy transition.
Only months ago, the energy minister told a private event that “every molecule of hydrocarbon will come out.”
The energy supply crisis the world is facing has given the country and its allies in OPEC more reasons to double down on the message, even though the reasons behind the shortages have less to do with green policies and more with a rapid rise in demand for energy after COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns.
“The world has sleepwalked into the supply crunch,” United Arab Emirates (UAE) Minister of State Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, who is chief executive officer at Abu Dhabi National Oil Co, told a panel discussion at the forum. “We cannot underestimate the importance of oil and gas in meeting global energy demands.”
While developing countries are seeking about US$100 billion annually to help finance the energy transition and build resilience against climate change, Saudi Arabia would not look to tap those sources.
“We are not seeking grants,” bin Salman said. “We are not seeking finance. We are not seeking any monetary support.”
Saudi Arabia, which relies on fossil fuel exports for the majority of its GDP, has struggled to diversify its economy.
The country’s cash cow, state-owned oil giant Saudi Arabian Oil Co, also set a goal to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, but only for emissions from its own operations.
More than 80 percent of the company’s total emissions come from customers burning its fossil fuels, which are not covered by the pledge.
Without continuing to export oil, the energy minister said that the country might not have the ability to reach those goals.
The nation has the highest per-capita emissions among G20 countries.
No country has a detailed plan for reaching net-zero emissions apart from the UK, which released a strategy document earlier this month.
The general contours involve increasing the share of renewables in the electricity sector, converting as much of the transportation sector to run on battery-powered vehicles as possible and then focusing on technology development for harder-to-abate sectors like industry and agriculture.
So what is Saudi Arabia’s plan for cutting emissions?
“We believe that carbon capture, utilization and storage, direct air capture, hydrogen, and low-carbon fuels are the things that will develop the necessary ingredients,” the energy minister said, adding that it would require “international cooperation in research, developing technologies and, most importantly, deploying these technologies.”
Saudi Arabia has also announced that it would join 35 other countries, led by the US and the EU, to cut methane emissions by 30 percent by 2030, relative to last year’s levels.
Scientists say that cutting leaks of the super-warming greenhouse gas is one of the quickest ways to slow down climate change.
Even though scientists have been warning about climate change for more than 30 years, it is only in the past few years that countries have come out and set net-zero emissions goals that are crucial if global temperatures are to be stabilized.
Green technologies would play an essential role in helping the world meet climate targets, but scientists agree that those objectives would not be within reach without reducing fossil-fuel extraction and use.
“Why 2060? Because most of these technologies may not mature before 2040,” bin Salman said.
The target year of 2060 matches the ambitions set by Russia and China, but it lags those set by other large economies like the US, the UK and the EU.
Even among petrostates, the UAE earlier this month set a net-zero goal for 2050.
“It’s an aspirational goal,” said Karen Young, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. “In some ways, it’s more of a branding exercise than an actual long-term policy commitment.”
Bin Salman reiterated a goal that the kingdom plans to increase the share of renewables to 50 percent of its energy mix, with natural gas covering the other half, by 2030.
That would require a huge change in less than nine years for a country where solar power barely registers today.
The country committed to investing 700 billion riyals (US$187 billion) in the green economy, without specifying the period over which that money would be spent.
“This will change the balance of COP,” said Marco Alvera, chief executive officer of gas logistics company Snam. “The private sector is very excited by all that’s happening in the Middle East and in the kingdom.”
The COP26 summit has been labeled a “make or break” moment for the planet.
UN officials welcomed Saudi Arabia’s announcement, saying that it would help the testy negotiations set to happen over the next few weeks.
“The existence of humanity on this planet is at risk because of climate change, so the announcement today is really a very, very powerful signal at the right moment,” said Patricia Espinosa, executive secretary at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which organizes COP meetings.
As part of the Paris climate agreement, which Saudi Arabia signed onto, countries must present plans setting targets for reducing emissions for the next decade.
Bin Salman showed an official letter to the forum audience confirming that the country had submitted its so-called “nationally determined contributions” toward global climate goals.
He said that the country would reduce emissions by 278 million tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2030, relative to a business-as-usual baseline.
The nation’s emissions would be between 741 million tonnes and 849 million tonnes that year, he said.
Comparing those figures with data from the Global Carbon Project shows that the actual emissions in 2030 might be 27 to 45 percent higher than in 2019.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS