As China repeatedly threatens Taiwan with incursions of fighter jets — even with all of the problems it has at home with the COVID-19 pandemic, its economy and energy shortages — the government should have a more comprehensive plan regarding military deployment.
Former chief of the general staff admiral Lee Hsi-ming (李喜明) on Sept. 17 presented a paper at an Academia Sinica seminar, saying that, according to Taiwan’s Overall Defense Concept military strategy, “victory” means denying the enemy control of Taiwan, and that Taiwanese as a whole must defend the nation against the military threat of the Chinese communists.
I believe that many Taiwanese feel the same way, as Beijing has long become the main existential threat to a democratic and free Taiwan — an ambition that has only grown day by day.
Since last year, Taiwan has received gestures of friendship and support from major countries — a source of pride to Taiwanese, who feel that they are finally emerging from the tumultuous time of the past four centuries.
However, despite the overall international situation being favorable toward Taiwan, the nation still faces constant military intimidation from China, and it cannot rely entirely on the friendship and support of other countries. Taiwan must be capable of standing up to China alone, and to have the knowledge and resolve to defeat a possible Chinese invasion.
The government should implement Lee’s recommendations and continue strengthening the country’s national defense capability, while also undertaking a review of the reserve forces and establishing a civilian defense corps, to give willing members of the public the opportunity to defend their country.
This way, even if Taiwan cannot stop China’s dream of invasion, Taiwanese can at least be united to maximize their readiness to frustration any invasion attempts.
It has been almost 30 years since I left the military, but if Taiwan were in difficulty, I would be willing to fight to protect my country. Most men in Taiwan have at least some military experience, and have gained trades and skills after returning to civilian life.
Not being in the armed forces has not diminished our willingness to defend Taiwanese lives, property, democracy and freedoms — and if anything, our resolve is stronger now than it was before. We would not flinch from going to war in Taiwan’s defense: We only fear being denied the opportunity to fight for our country, the way Hong Kongers were.
My earnest hope is that the government would establish a civilian defense corps as soon as it can — to allow Taiwanese to organize, put their skills to good use and receive training in the military skills needed — so that this civilian defense corps will be ready and able to act as a reserve and support for the enlisted soldiers, and build a strong line of defense to protect Taiwan.
Lin Chin-kuo is a business manager at a technology company.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS