In a close contest, former New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) on Saturday last week was elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman for a second time. Many people wonder what the result of this internecine KMT power struggle means for Taiwanese politics — if Chu fails to get a firm grasp of the situation, he might inadvertently help the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) secure a third term in office.
The day after the election, Chu received a congratulatory telegram from Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Chu replied, thanking Xi as the two return to acknowledging the so-called “1992 consensus” and opposition to Taiwanese independence. This shows that when Chu called his rival for the chairperson seat, Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), a “red unification” candidate who would turn the KMT into a “little red” cheerleader for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), it was nothing more than internal conflict during a particularly acrimonious party leadership campaign — perhaps Chu was also trying to get Beijing’s attention.
However, Chu’s support base is weaker than even outgoing KMT Chairman Johnny Chiang’s (江啟臣) was when he took over the reins last year. Moreover, in less than 24 hours, Chu was “reined in” by Beijing, showing that his political abilities have not evolved since his defeat in the 2016 presidential election. It was pure irony when he said right after his win: “It is time for the DPP to start worrying.”
Xi’s congratulatory message conveyed two important points.
First, it affirmed the political basis for cooperation between the KMT and the CCP, which was approved by Xi during a Chu-Xi meeting in China in 2015.
Second, Xi said that the two parties must work together to further the goal of national unification and rejuvenation. Xi was signaling to Chu that he expects the KMT, under Chu’s leadership, to push for “rapid unification.” If not an explicit order, Xi was expressing an expectation.
Chu’s reply to Xi was critically important. First, he took an axe to Chiang’s reformist policies. He attributed the cause of the “precipitous cross-strait situation” to the DPP’s “desinicization and anti-China policies,” and said it is the DPP that has changed the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait. Chu is thus endorsing and providing political legitimacy to the CCP’s bullying of Taiwan.
Second, Chu echoed Xi’s phrase “all Chinese sons and daughters” by saying that “the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are the descendants of the Fiery Emperor and the Yellow Emperor.” Next, he recited the familiar incantations of the so-called “1992 consensus” and opposition to Taiwanese independence.
Chu’s choice of words clearly shows that the KMT and the CCP are a united front, working hand-in-glove to attack their mutual enemy, the DPP.
Chu ended his telegram with abject capitulation, replacing the Republic of China calendar date format in his sign off with a People’s Republic of China-endorsed Gregorian calendar date. It was a gesture of unfettered devotion to his master in Beijing.
Chu’s overt mirroring of Xi’s language is particularly telling. Although the DPP immediately sent flowers and a message of congratulations to Chu following his election, Chu waited for Xi’s written instructions before offloading on the DPP. It is an incriminating timeline.
Chang, who lost out to Chu, is at least honest about his intentions. Chu, on the other hand, comes across as dishonest and crafty: These are unappealing character traits. The DPP will likely not be losing much sleep over Chu’s chairmanship of the KMT; it might, in fact, be rather pleased.
Tzou Jiing-wen is the editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper).
Translated by Edward Jones
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS