The Ministry of National Defense is planning to resume training for “goose step” marching at the Military Academy — previously known as the Whampoa Military Academy — to celebrate its centennial anniversary in 2024.
Marching in goose step does nothing to improve military strength, and such training is meaningless.
The Office of the Deputy Chief of the General Staff for Training should abolish this kind of promotional activity, and instead work harder to synchronize training with Israel, Singapore and the US.
The military’s formal step marching originated from, but is more laborious than, Germany’s goose step marching, as soldiers must move their arms and legs like robots.
It is performed by swinging the hand forward at 90 degrees and backward at 15 degrees, while kicking the feet up at 45 degrees and pressing the toes downward during the kick to step forcefully with a loud sound. It is enough to make a soldier lose their breath even during a short march past a review stand.
Training the soldiers is time-consuming, as their movements must be synchronized so that they can march in perfectly straight lines. Without at least three months of intensive practice, marching past the review stand only looks disorderly.
Doctors have even said that stepping forcefully enough on the ground to make the loud sound could injure the brain.
As a result, by the time that Taiwan discontinued goose step marching in 2003, the Naval Academy and the Air Force Academy had already canceled the practice, and only the Military Academy and National Defense University’s Fu Hsing Kang College were practicing it once per week.
Some might say that the Military Academy is only planning to march in goose step for its centennial anniversary, not promote it for the entire armed forces. This viewpoint might overlook that preparations for the ceremony are inevitably to take students away from their regular coursework.
In particular, if goose step marching becomes a success, it could also be promoted elsewhere in the military.
Each of the academies is to send a marching company to the Military Academy to celebrate the anniversary. In the past, when a marching company was understaffed, members of field forces were dispatched instead. This means that ceremony preparations are to affect the academies, and perhaps other troops as well.
Not long ago, the army tried to promote its “battle drum team,” and now it wants to resume goose step marching.
The military has been criticized for ordering soldiers to sweep the floor or clean the camp to kill time, and now it wants to add this marching skill: How is that going to enhance Taiwan’s military strength?
The US Military Academy at West Point marches past review stands without performing the goose step and its combat powers remain strong. How strong is Taiwan’s combat power?
The answer to this question is self-evident.
Goose step marching is suitable for a limited number of units such as the military’s honor guard.
Every ministry policy has an effect on future officers and generals — hopefully they will not focus on superficial appearances. During the four years of academy education, “iron is refined into steel,” and students have many things to learn. Goose step marching should not be one of them — it is an anachronism.
The military should adjust its position and instead adopt the “slow march,” as used by US and British soldiers, as it is solemn and easy to learn.
Chu-Ke Feng-yun is a director of a hospital’s medical management department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS