At the height of the Cold War, the administration of former US president Richard Nixon developed a strategic policy with the intent of weakening the Soviet Union. This involved forming an alliance with the People’s Republic of China.
To ingratiate itself with the Chinese Communist Party, Washington capitulated to Beijing’s provocative “one China” policy. The decision caused Taiwan much grief in the international arena, although the situation today is very different.
In 2019, Taiwan’s representative office in Washington, formerly the Coordination Council for North American Affairs, was renamed the Taiwan Council for US Affairs. The US Congress earlier this year introduced the Taiwan Diplomatic Review Act. It requires that the office be renamed again to the Taiwan Representative Office.
Japan has gone even further. Its national broadcaster, NHK, referred to Taiwan’s Olympic team as “Taiwan” rather than “Chinese Taipei” when it appeared during the Tokyo 2020 opening ceremony.
Japan’s annual defense white paper, published last month, also features a significant change regarding Taiwan. The yearly report customarily adheres to Beijing’s “one China” policy, but for the first time this year a map within the document featured Taiwan as a separate entity, shaded in a different color from China, signifying a major shift.
On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives passed the Fiscal Year 2022 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Funding Bill. It was passed with an amendment that would prohibit any US government department from producing, purchasing or displaying any map depicting Taiwan as part of China. The proposer of the amendment, US Representative Tom Tiffany, called Beijing’s “one China” policy “bogus” and a “lie,” and called on the US to abandon its “dishonest” adherence to it.
Both the US’ and Japan’s attitudes toward Taiwan have changed markedly. This dramatic shift lies in the transformed international strategic environment resulting from China’s repeated provocations in the Taiwan Strait, along with its hegemonic behavior in the entire Indo-Pacific region, which has raised the specter of regional conflict.
The international picture is shaping up to be greatly in Taiwan’s favor. Washington and Tokyo have made it clear that they are no longer willing to accept the “one China” lie. This begs the question: What is Taiwan’s own position?
Each time a Taiwanese competitor won a medal at this year’s Olympics, the nation erupted in excitement. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) called Taiwan’s athletes “the pride of Taiwan.” However, the national team is still saddled with the name “Chinese Taipei,” allowing nationalist Chinese to falsely combine Taiwan’s successes and medal tally with their own.
A series of doping scandals had the Russian national team banned from this year’s Olympics. Some Russian athletes competed in the Games, but as the “Russian Olympic Committee” — resulting in the acronym “ROC.” At first glance, it would appear to some that there were two Republic of China (ROC) teams at the Games. British newspaper The Guardian reported an amusing incident where the Russian Olympic Committee’s flag had been misprinted as “Chinese Taipei.”
The bungle should remind Taiwanese that we cannot continue fooling ourselves and others with the “one China” lie. The US and Japan are taking actions to jettison the lie into the dustbin of history. Is Taiwan following suit? It is time that we woke up from this lie and started calling ourselves by our name: Taiwan.
Tommy Lin is a physician and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Edward Jones
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India