At the height of the Cold War, the administration of former US president Richard Nixon developed a strategic policy with the intent of weakening the Soviet Union. This involved forming an alliance with the People’s Republic of China.
To ingratiate itself with the Chinese Communist Party, Washington capitulated to Beijing’s provocative “one China” policy. The decision caused Taiwan much grief in the international arena, although the situation today is very different.
In 2019, Taiwan’s representative office in Washington, formerly the Coordination Council for North American Affairs, was renamed the Taiwan Council for US Affairs. The US Congress earlier this year introduced the Taiwan Diplomatic Review Act. It requires that the office be renamed again to the Taiwan Representative Office.
Japan has gone even further. Its national broadcaster, NHK, referred to Taiwan’s Olympic team as “Taiwan” rather than “Chinese Taipei” when it appeared during the Tokyo 2020 opening ceremony.
Japan’s annual defense white paper, published last month, also features a significant change regarding Taiwan. The yearly report customarily adheres to Beijing’s “one China” policy, but for the first time this year a map within the document featured Taiwan as a separate entity, shaded in a different color from China, signifying a major shift.
On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives passed the Fiscal Year 2022 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Funding Bill. It was passed with an amendment that would prohibit any US government department from producing, purchasing or displaying any map depicting Taiwan as part of China. The proposer of the amendment, US Representative Tom Tiffany, called Beijing’s “one China” policy “bogus” and a “lie,” and called on the US to abandon its “dishonest” adherence to it.
Both the US’ and Japan’s attitudes toward Taiwan have changed markedly. This dramatic shift lies in the transformed international strategic environment resulting from China’s repeated provocations in the Taiwan Strait, along with its hegemonic behavior in the entire Indo-Pacific region, which has raised the specter of regional conflict.
The international picture is shaping up to be greatly in Taiwan’s favor. Washington and Tokyo have made it clear that they are no longer willing to accept the “one China” lie. This begs the question: What is Taiwan’s own position?
Each time a Taiwanese competitor won a medal at this year’s Olympics, the nation erupted in excitement. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) called Taiwan’s athletes “the pride of Taiwan.” However, the national team is still saddled with the name “Chinese Taipei,” allowing nationalist Chinese to falsely combine Taiwan’s successes and medal tally with their own.
A series of doping scandals had the Russian national team banned from this year’s Olympics. Some Russian athletes competed in the Games, but as the “Russian Olympic Committee” — resulting in the acronym “ROC.” At first glance, it would appear to some that there were two Republic of China (ROC) teams at the Games. British newspaper The Guardian reported an amusing incident where the Russian Olympic Committee’s flag had been misprinted as “Chinese Taipei.”
The bungle should remind Taiwanese that we cannot continue fooling ourselves and others with the “one China” lie. The US and Japan are taking actions to jettison the lie into the dustbin of history. Is Taiwan following suit? It is time that we woke up from this lie and started calling ourselves by our name: Taiwan.
Tommy Lin is a physician and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Edward Jones
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS