Because of the nation’s low vaccination coverage, the government has been ordering large amounts of vaccines from international manufacturers.
Some people have questioned the prices that the government is paying for vaccines, while others have questioned the profitability of domestically developed and produced vaccines.
These objections and doubts are not completely unfounded, but regardless of whether the information about prices and profitability comes from insiders or from malicious opponents to the ruling government, it is provoking many public reactions. The reason likely relates to a lack of confidence in the government’s integrity.
Whether it is the Corruption Perceptions Index or the Government Defense Integrity Index, prestigious international government integrity review organizations have repeatedly given Taiwan highly positive ratings for political integrity in the past few years, based on the results of empirical surveys and expert opinions.
The question is why Taiwanese still lack a high degree of confidence in the integrity of their government. There is a deep-rooted reason, and it might have to do with local governments.
Most of the analysis of anti-corruption initiatives is based on a national framework, and the performance indicators are focused on the central government’s achievements and lack any explicit focus on local governments. People generally do not realize that, rather than referring to bureaucrats at the central government level, public perception of the government is based on the integrity of their locally elected representatives and the performance of their local governments.
Moreover, nepotism is a more common occurrence in local governments, and transparency into hiring and procurement is much lower than at the central government level. This makes corruption much more feasible.
In addition to the unprecedented international support and attention that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) foreign affairs and defense policies have attracted during her second term in office, she will hopefully also be able to accomplish a few achievements when it comes to the eradication of local corruption, as this is a matter of immense importance.
At the same time, the Agency Against Corruption and the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau are particularly important when it comes to making a substantive effort to fight corruption, because in a democracy, the freedom of the media and a vibrant democratic process provide strong support for anti-corruption efforts and increase the effectiveness of anti-corruption agencies. If this could be coupled with efficient electronic government systems to investigate and unearth wrongdoing, it should be possible to enhance the perception of government integrity in Taiwan.
Tsao Yao-chun is a researcher with the Chinese Association of Public Affairs Management and a Government Defense Integrity Index external expert.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS