When Taiwanese athletes entered the arena during the Tokyo Olympics’ opening ceremony, Mayuko Wakuda, an announcer at Japanese broadcaster NHK, said: “It’s Taiwan.” It struck a chord with all Taiwanese, who began enthusiastically sharing the clip.
Saying “all Taiwanese” might not be entirely true, because Chinese were mad, and some people who live in Taiwan, but think they are Chinese, were mad, too.
Amazingly, playing up to the Chinese Communist Party, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) said that “this is not the time to push the name rectification campaign.”
Not surprisingly, he was criticized by people who asked why he would not listen to what Taiwanese, especially the young generation, want and why the KMT could not go along with public opinion for once.
When Chinese streaming giant Tencent stopped the broadcast as Taiwan entered the arena as team No. 104, and instead broadcast a talk show, Chinese Internet users also missed the entrance of team No. 108 — the Chinese team. Hopping mad, they stormed a Tencent microblog, causing it to crash. To see that Chinese completely lack self confidence and that Chinese media are so fearful of Taiwan is dumbfounding.
Representative to Japan Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) on July 24 said that most people think “Chinese Taipei” sounds weird, so when NHK said: “It’s Taiwan,” everyone started cheering in the representative office’s studio.
Why did the announcer say: “It’s Taiwan”? Because just as the world does not know any country by the name “Chinese Taipei,” nor do Japanese.
However, most Japanese know and like Taiwan, so when “Chinese Taipei” was announced to enter the arena, everyone was confused. Only after Wakuda added a clarifying “It’s Taiwan,” Japanese and athletes present began cheering.
Taiwan is of course Taiwan, and calling it “Chinese Taipei” is neither fish nor fowl, just as calling it Zhongguo Taibei (China, Taipei, 中國台北) or Zhongguode Taibei (China’s Taipei, 中國的台北) in Chinese is very strange.
Some “Chinese” in Taiwan think that by saying Zhonghua Taibei (Chinese Taipei, 中華台北), they would manage to trick themselves and others into believing that the Republic of China (ROC) still exists, yet they are afraid of uttering that title. It is as if they had split personalities.
It sounds odd when a media report says that “so-and-so from Tainan in Chinese Taipei won gold.” What does Tainan have to do with Taipei? What is wrong with “from Tainan in Taiwan”?
When traveling, Taiwanese — regardless of political affiliation — say “Taiwan” when someone asks where they are from, not the ROC; and all the good stuff is MIT — Made in Taiwan — not MIROC.
At the Tokyo Olympics, the NHK announcer is not the only one who says “Taiwan”: When medals are awarded, they are registered under Taiwan, and many other countries also speak of Taiwan.
People are guessing that it is about the approval of the Japanese government and its Olympic committee, but it could also have to do with Taiwan being an independent and sovereign country.
Unfortunately, Taiwan’s Olympic committee still refuses to rectify its name. When Olympic medalist Chi Cheng (紀政) in 2018 proposed a referendum on Taiwan participating under the name “Taiwan,” the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee opposed the suggestion. It is simply shameful.
The government should disentangle itself from the mess and change its name to “Taiwan Olympic Committee,” and Taiwan should face the world as Taiwan, and nothing else.
Twu Shiing-jer is chairman of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance and a former mayor of Chiayi City.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS