Two teams, from two Chinese cities, confronting each other on a badminton court, thwacking the shuttlecock back and forth.
Nothing unusual there. In China, teams play each other all the time. For the mixed doubles pairing from Beijing that emerged victorious, the match had the banality of any other domestic competition.
“Because we know each other so well,” said the woman on the winning team, Huang Yaqiong (黃雅瓊). “There’s nothing different.”
Illustration: Mountain People
Except this was an Olympic semifinal at the Tokyo Olympics. And for China, the rare privilege of being able to field two distinct teams — one from the Chinese mainland, in bright communist red, the other from its territory of Hong Kong, in a royal blue — was essentially giving it two bites at the Olympic cherry. That is two routes to securing another of those shiny Olympic gold medals that Chinese communist leaders so crave as proof they are doing a sterling job.
China’s double-teaming of the Olympics — the equivalent, say, of the US fielding both a national team and another of athletes solely from New York — has never been much of an issue at the Olympics and is not becoming one so far in Tokyo.
However, two things are happening that could weigh on the equation.
First, Hong Kong is winning, like never before. Tokyo is the most successful games ever for the territory of 7.5 million people on the south China coast. A gold medal in the men’s foil event for fencer Cheung Ka Long (張家朗) was Hong Kong’s first since the one-time British colony was reabsorbed by China in 1997. Cheung was born just 20 days before that momentous change in Hong Kong’s trajectory.
When windsurfer Lee Lai-shan (李麗珊) won Hong Kong’s first and only previous gold, at the Atlanta Games in 1996, God Save the Queen played at the medal ceremony. In Tokyo, for Cheung, it was China’s anthem, March of the Volunteers.
Swimmer Siobhan Haughey (何詩蓓), born in Hong Kong four months after the 1997 handover, also has two silver medals from Tokyo, becoming the territory’s first multiple medalist. Their combined haul of treasure outshines the one gold, one silver and one bronze that Hong Kong had accumulated through all of its previous appearances since its Olympic debut in 1952.
However, such success also begs a question: Is it fair that China — with one team labeled China and the other Hong Kong, China — is getting multiple pathways to Olympic podiums? Should Hong Kong athletes instead be folded into China’s national team — as, for example, athletes from Scotland, Wales and some from Northern Ireland are in Team Great Britain with the English?
One could even argue that China is extra-privileged by having three teams at the Games, if one accepts Beijing’s position that the island of Taiwan is also part of its territory. To avoid a battle with Beijing, Taiwan is made to compete at the Olympics as “Chinese Taipei.” That is the name of the capital of the nation off China’s east coast, which became the refuge for China’s Nationalist government when it fled the communist takeover of the mainland.
Naturally, Hong Kong athletes shudder at any suggestion of losing their team.
“Hong Kong really has its own special characteristics. We have always had our own training system,” said Tse Ying Suet (謝影雪), the female member of the “Hong Kong, China” pairing that lost to mainland China in the badminton mixed doubles semis.
“It’s a matter of pride for Hong Kong that from such a small place, you can get a fencing gold medal and a swimming silver medal. It’s such fun that a place so small can perform so well,” Tse said.
The other change in any re-evaluation of whether Hong Kong still warrants its own team is how China has been treating the territory of late. In short, not kindly.
An ongoing crackdown in Hong Kong on pro-democracy voices has followed in the wake of often violent protests against the government and China that convulsed the territory for months in 2019.
On the same day that Haughey booked her first ticket to a Tokyo final, in the 200m freestyle, a court in Hong Kong found the first person guilty of secessionism and terrorism under a sweeping new National Security Law.
The erosion of Hong Kong’s freedoms feeds in multiple ways into the question of its Olympic team.
On the one hand, every arrest, every newspaper closure and every other blow to the liberties that set Hong Kong apart from China’s other cities would seem to undermine the justification for its separate status at the Games.
Beijing and Shanghai do not get Olympic teams, so the more it resembles them, why should Hong Kong? However, on the other hand, to strip Hong Kong of its team when its uniqueness is already under attack would be another morale-bashing blow to its identity.
“Hongkongers want to be represented independently at sporting events, as it helps grow their community and the sense of belonging,” said Nathan Law (羅冠聰), a Hong Kong opposition leader based in Britain. “As Hong Kong enjoys a distinct culture and community, they should continue to be represented by their own team.”
Crowds have also sent that message by gathering in Hong Kong shopping malls to cheer on their medal winners. Malls were places of protest in 2019.
Videos on social media showed a mall crowd chanting “We are Hong Kong” as a giant screen broadcast the Tokyo medal ceremony for Cheung, largely drowning out China’s anthem.
Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute deputy CEO Chung Kim-wah (鍾劍華) said that Hong Kong’s Olympic team has become “a symbol of resistance” for people who are angry and frustrated at Beijing.
Rooting for Hong Kong athletes and also cheering when mainland Chinese athletes lose is “an expression of the growing antagonism,” he said.
Chung added that he would not be surprised if Beijing seeks to disband Hong Kong’s team in the future and incorporate its athletes into one China team, to knock away another aspect of the territory’s uniqueness.
“Beijing thinks that it can do anything,” he said.
Although Hong Kong is unusual in the Olympic movement, it is not alone in being both separate, but not entirely so.
Should athletes from the Pacific island of Guam or the US Virgin Islands in the Caribbean triumph in Tokyo, the anthem their Olympic champions would hear would be the US one, The Star Spangled Banner. As US territories, they compete under their own flags at the Games, like Hong Kong. American Samoa and Puerto Rico also have their own teams.
Olympic historian David Wallechinsky describes Olympic organizers’ position on such territories as “ambiguous and fluid.”
“Hong Kong and the other colonies appear to have been allowed to continue as beneficiaries of a sort of grandfather clause, although I have never seen a document explaining the situation,” he said.
For the moment, then, Hong Kong’s Olympic future seems solid. But for how long?
“There has been no discussion of Hong Kong’s status as far as I am aware,” International Olympic Committee spokesman Mark Adams said on Friday. “I see no reason why it won’t continue.”
Local media reported earlier this month that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) criticized President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for referring to China as a “neighboring country,” saying that this is no different from a “two-state” model and that it amounts to changing the cross-strait “status quo.” I find it quite impossible to understand why civilized Taiwan continues to tolerate the existence of such a deceitful group that believes its own lies. The relationship between Taiwan and China is the relationship between two countries, and neither has any jurisdiction over the other — this is the undeniable “status quo.” Those who believe in the
On Thursday, China applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) — a regional economic organization whose 11 member countries have a combined GDP of US$11 trillion. That is less than China’s 2019 GDP of US$14.34 trillion, so why is China so eager to join? China says there are two main reasons: To consolidate its foreign trade and foreign investment base, and to fast-track economic and trade relations between China and member countries of the CPTPP free-trade area. China’s bilateral trade with these countries grew from US$78 billion in 2003 to US$685.1 billion last year, mostly because of China’s 2005
US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) talked on the telephone on Thursday last week, the first time the two leaders have done so since Biden assumed the presidency. While each side sought to put their own gloss on the content of the conversation, some common ground did emerge. Biden reportedly said that both sides have a joint responsibility to ensure that competition between the US and China does not spiral into conflict and that there is no reason that the two nations are destined to fall into this trap. The day after the phone call, the Financial Times reported
WASHINGTON [Special Commentary]: It is just a teensy-weensy change, a change of one little syllable. It is barely noticeable unless you’re watching really carefully: The Tai-“pei” Representative Office in Washington, D.C. (TECRO) could soon change its name — just ever so very slightly — to Tai-“wan” Representative Office. The office’s “TECRO” initials would remain the same. It will be only a symbolic change. London’s Financial Times reported last week that such a change may soon be coming. The timing was a bit awkward, though. The FT’s report came out on the very same day that Taiwan Foreign Minister Joseph Wu (吳釗燮)