The Tokyo Olympics will perhaps be remembered as one of the oddest Games in the event’s long and checkered history. Held amid a global pandemic, spectators are banned from most venues, leaving athletes to play out their feats of sporting brilliance in eerie silence. Meanwhile, furious Tokyo residents wave placards outside some venues, calling for the Games’ cancelation. Adding to the incongruity of it all, the entire Russian team is absent, banned due to a doping scandal.
That the Tokyo Olympics went ahead at all has been extremely contentious in Japan. Critics fear a mass outbreak of the highly contagious Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 possibily being imported by some of athletes, Olympic officials and VIPs jetting in from abroad. Their fears are not unwarranted: Tokyo recorded 3,865 new COVID-19 cases yesterday, a daily record for a third day running, putting pressure on hospitals. Despite the unprecedented atmosphere, one aspect of the Games has not changed: petty nationalism and the politicization of sport.
Japanese and Taiwanese athletes have so far had good showings, though things have not gone smoothly for some of their Chinese counterparts. This has infuriated China’s nationalist keyboard warriors — known as “little pinks” (小粉紅) in Chinese — who are in a full meltdown over a series of perceived slights to their nation’s dignity.
Meanwhile, China’s state broadcasters have been tying themselves in knots to explain away every high-profile “failure” by Chinese athletes — anything less than a gold medal — and have been desperately cooking up excuses for every setback.
The first “incident” occurred as Taiwan’s Olympic team entered the stadium during the opening ceremony. Japanese state broadcaster NHK displayed “Taiwan” in Japanese on the screen, rather than “Chinese Taipei,” a Beijing-mandated oxymoron. The little pinks saw red, and China’s censors panicked. Live footage in China was suddenly cut and was not restored until after China’s team had made their entry into the stadium, further infuriating Chinese social media users.
On Saturday last week, female weightlifter Hou Zhihui (侯志慧) won China’s second gold medal of the Games. This should have been cause for celebration in the country, but brittle nationalists baulked at an “ugly” photograph of Hou straining to lift a weight about twice as heavy as herself posted on Twitter by Reuters. Little pinks bitterly accused “foreign media” of deliberately insulting China. Chinese diplomats also weighed in, with the Chinese embassy in Sri Lanka on Twitter calling Reuters biased and shameless.
Other “incidents” include protestations over awards podium spacing and Taiwan’s men’s archery team trouncing China 5-1 in the quarter-finals. The latter drove China’s nationalists around the bend. They turned on their own, branding Chinese archer Wang Dapeng (王大鵬) a disgrace to the nation and a “fat ugly loser.”
Then there was a nail-biting finish to a doubles table tennis match on Monday, which saw Chinese players narrowly lose to their Japanese opponents. State broadcaster China Central Television jumped the gun and prematurely declared that China had won gold. The little pinks ragefully blamed the loss on everything from unfair judges to poor lighting to the Japanese players’ “dazzling” uniforms.
The only people bringing shame to China are the country’s spittle-flecked nationalists. Their hypersensitivity and nitpicking over every “unflattering” portrayal of China looks pathetic to the outside world. Their wafer-thin skin betrays an inferiority complex and deep-seated insecurity. A truly confident “great nation” would not act in such a manner. Perhaps it is the impotent rage of a people who dare not criticize their own government for its manifest failings, and instead turn on “foreign devils” to let off steam.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
The victory of Vice President William Lai (賴清德) in January’s presidential election raised questions about the future of China’s unification strategy toward Taiwan. A decade ago, the assumption in Bejing had been that deepening economic ties with Taiwan would bring about a political accommodation eventually leading to political integration. Not only has this not happened, but it hastened the opposite. Taiwanese are more concerned with safeguarding their political independence than they have ever been. China’s preferred party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has not won a presidential election since 2012. Clearly, Beijing’s strategy is not working. Polling conducted by the Institute of European