On July 1, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) celebrated its centennial.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairs Lien Chan (連戰) and Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), as well as People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and New Party Chairman Wu Cherng-dean (吳成典), cosigned a telegram to Beijing to show support and congratulate Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the CCP.
Lien and Hung led the KMT in the era following the death of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), and Soong has been called Chiang’s chosen heir.
Most of these politicians no longer have a political future in Taiwan, and KMT Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), who still cares about the support of Taiwanese voters, did not join them.
After fleeing China in 1949, the KMT and Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) initially said that the Republic of China (ROC) was dead, but then, in the name of anti-communism, they moved on and implemented their dictatorship in Taiwan.
They said that the government would go through three stages, from military rule and political tutelage to constitutional rule, but then, as an excuse to block democratization, they implemented the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款).
The KMT left its bloody imprint on Taiwan during the White Terror era that followed the 228 Incident.
Lien largely owed his position of power to his “half mountain” background — a term that describes Taiwanese who left for China during the Japanese colonial period and returned after World War II — as well as the status of his father, Lien Chen-tung (連震東), who was accused by Taiwanese writer Wu Cho-liu (吳濁流) of cooperating with the KMT government after the war.
Lien Chan was defeated in the 2000 presidential election after Soong ran against him as an independent candidate, splitting the pan-blue camp’s vote and paving the way for the presidency of Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
In 2004, Lien Chan ran again, as vice presidential candidate on a joint ticket with Soong, only to be defeated again. Thereafter, he sided with China, becoming the poster boy for China’s “united front” warfare against Taiwan.
In the contentious 2000 election, those who supported Lien Chan, saying that his nomination showed that the KMT was moving beyond its colonial mindset, were wrong about him.
To what extend is Lien Chan Taiwanese and different from Soong?
In 1964, Peng Ming-min (彭明敏), together with Hsieh Tsung-min (謝聰敏) and Wei Ting-chao (魏廷朝), drafted A Declaration of Formosan Self-salvation.
Peng had been a UN delegate and was aware that the notion of the ROC’s continued existance was problematic.
Peng went on to advocate for Taiwanese independence from overseas, while Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) joined the KMT to fight for Taiwan at home and later became president.
Peng’s declaration is still golden advice, and Lee’s Taiwanization of the ROC was also a kind of Taiwanese self-salvation.
Former minister of foreign affairs George Yeh (葉公超) and former ambassador to the UN Chiang Ting-fu (蔣廷黻) were intellectuals with a backbone.
During the first decades of KMT rule in Taiwan, they were sincerely speaking the truth, but later sycophants gained influence.
It is perhaps not strange that the KMT no longer remembers the two Chiangs, and former party officials and military leaders turn to China to flatter its president.
During the Martial Law period, the KMT accused anyone with a dissenting opinion of being a communist. Today, KMT members are begging the CCP for help, a party that wants to see the end of Taiwan and the KMT.
From being anti-communist to surrendering to the CCP and even joining hands with Beijing, Lien Chan and Soong still hankered for the presidency so badly that they ran twice.
It is this “China disease” and the poison of power that is destroying Taiwan. Only heaven knows what the Chinese see in these rogue politicians.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS