Vaccine donations from the US and Japan have prompted elements within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to say that Taiwan has become a “vaccine beggar.” Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is also chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party, threw in his own two cents’ worth, suggesting that Taiwan is like a little brother accepting a “settling-in” allowance.
It is deeply regrettable that these people have cast such negative aspersions on demonstrations of international friendship.
Following this, the program Across the Strait, aired on the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) state television station, mocked Taiwan for “becoming a beggar island” and for being a “vaccine refugee.”
This latest wave of China’s “vaccine warfare” is being aided and abetted in its continued onslaught of words and military intimidation by pro-CCP elements within Taiwan and by its own propaganda machinery, insulting democracy and freedom with such demeaning terms as “beggar” and “refugee” — thereby implying praise for authoritarianism — while disseminating online disinformation and rumors of Taiwanese celebrities seeking the Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine.
The front line of the battle for moral supremacy between the democratic and authoritarian models is no longer the Taiwan Strait — it is in Taiwan itself, fought as a media civil war.
For several months now, China’s official state media have been pushing the vaccine issue, with the Global Times on June 18 accusing Taiwan of being a “vaccine orphaned island,” and saying that China’s offer of arranging vaccines to be sent to its “Taiwanese compatriots” was rebuffed, and was Taiwan “cutting off its own escape route.”
On June 15, the People’s Daily Overseas Edition ran an editorial saying that the “Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities” were politicizing vaccines and “putting lives at risk for their own gain,” while accusing Taiwan of “playing the pandemic card” to further its independence agenda.
However they parse it, it is quite apparent that somebody is none too happy that Taiwanese are reluctant to get Chinese-made vaccines.
Just as Lithuanian Minister for Foreign Affairs Gabrielius Landsbergis said when he announced on Twitter that his country would be donating vaccines to Taiwan — “Freedom-loving people should look out for each other!” — the US, the EU and Australia have all set the tone of the dynamic as a struggle between the values of democracy and authoritarianism.
However, in Taiwan, the opposition parties and some politicians within the DPP have taken to repeating the phrase “putting lives at risk for their own gain” within the context of the government’s insistence on providing Taiwan-produced vaccines for Taiwanese.
Vaccine research and development is a scientific and medical issue. You can question it, but to say that it is “putting lives at risk for one’s own gain” is an overstatement, just as much as saying that Taiwan is a “vaccine beggar.”
Coincidentally, just as the Taiwan-produced vaccines were reaching a crucial stage in their development, disinformation about them started appearing on the Internet, such as articles that detailed inaccurate statistics for the vaccine’s lab results and have proven to be false.
As early as Feb. 28, Chinese state media had published an article saying that Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) was using the vaccine war as a way to profit while putting Taiwanese lives at risk. This concept can be traced back to this date, and from here it was taken up by political talk shows, spread online and subject to manipulation in the media. It was then bolstered by Chinese state media, people working on their behalf in Taiwan, public relations companies and private pollsters, who increased their attacks in the media on a daily basis.
Binding piecemeal messaging with emotive headlines is explosive stuff. Unreasonable, exaggerated phrases such as “vaccine refugees,” “beggar island” and “putting lives at risk for one’s own gain” are already causing serious rifts in Taiwan.
Chien Yu-yen works in the media.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS