In the May 1 issue of the weekly The Economist, Taiwan was the cover story, with the sensational headline “The most dangerous place on Earth.” [One of the issue’s two articles on Taiwan,] which detailed changes in the trilateral relationship between Taiwan, China and the US, caused a stir in Taiwan. Some of the article’s arguments, which focus on China’s growing military strength, make sense, but are not entirely correct.
From the perspective of bilateral interaction alone, it is indisputable that the stronger China’s military is, the greater the threat to Taiwan.
However, cross-strait relations cannot be singled out from the context of international relations. If the possibility of support from other countries were also considered, it could lead to the paradox that the stronger China’s military is, the safer Taiwan would be.
According to the article, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co produces 84 percent of the world’s advanced chips, which are crucial to global industrial development. How can other countries just sit back and ignore the situation in the Taiwan Strait? Apart from the US, even France and Germany, which have seldom intervened in East Asian affairs, have launched their own Indo-Pacific strategies to ensure regional stability.
The article said that US Admiral Phil Davidson, head of the Indo-Pacific Command, in March told the US Congress that he worried about China attacking Taiwan as soon as 2027. This comment is rather self-centered.
It is not news that the US Department of Defense has intentionally exaggerated China’s military capabilities to obtain funds from Congress. For example, in the department’s Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China report published in September last year, it said that China has 350 warships, surpassing the US’ 293, but it did not mention that China’s fleet is still far below the standard of the US in terms of performance or gross tonnage.
The Indo-Pacific Command is the latest department agency to be restructured, and it is not impossible that the commander deliberately exaggerated China’s intention to use force against Taiwan to show some results.
In addition, The Economist article analyzes only the international situation, but ignores that Chinese concerns over the domestic situation are distracting Beijing from focusing on the Taiwan issue in the near future. The 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is to be held in October next year. Following precedent, past Chinese presidents have served two terms, and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) should have named a successor as party general secretary at the 19th National Congress and appointed that successor to the Standing Committee of the Central Political Bureau and as vice president.
However, no such arrangements were made, indicating that Xi is likely to stay on, which would inevitably create dissatisfaction among CCP factions. Although Xi might choose to use military force against Taiwan to gain domestic support, the significant gap in military strength between the US and China could cause Xi to have to step down early.
It is sometimes said that the most dangerous place is the safest place. Taiwan and the Taiwanese are perhaps best situated to prove this saying: Amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan’s performance has been outstanding, and economic growth, and the stock and foreign-exchange markets have reached historical highs. This demonstrates that Taiwanese are full of confidence for the future, and they have no reason to fear alarmist foreign media outlets.
Yang Chung-hsin is a civil servant.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS