With Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) targeting China’s massive tech giants, the big question now is how he would get them to share key data as part of a sweeping plan to transform the world’s second-biggest economy.
Until recently, China’s megafirms, such as Jack Ma’s (馬雲) Alibaba Group Holding Ltd and Tencent Holdings Ltd, have operated in a similar way to US counterparts Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc, harnessing user data to refine an expanding array of digital services. Since more data lead to better products, the tech platforms often become natural monopolies — giving them enormous wealth and power that also opens the door for abuses.
More US lawmakers have started calling for legislation to break up the US firms, but so far those efforts have failed to gain much traction. Europe has focused mainly on giving users more control over data and levying hefty antitrust fines against companies like Google.
Illustration: Yusha
China, by contrast, is going further than any other country to rein its tech behemoths. Xi last month declared his intention to go after “platform” companies that amass data to create monopolies and gobble up smaller competitors. Chinese regulators followed up by slapping a record US$2.8 billion fine on Alibaba for abuse of market dominance, and gave dozens of other top Internet firms a month to rectify anti-competitive practices.
While part of the motivation is political, a potentially more important aspect is China’s attempt to create a market for data that unleashes its value and propels growth. Beijing is pouring money into digital infrastructure, drafting new laws on data usage and building new data centers around the nation, with the goal of positioning China as a leader in transforming the world economy over the next few decades.
“This is not a short-term initiative — it is a complete national refocusing on data as an economic driver,” said Kendra Schaefer, head of digital research at Trivium China, a consultancy in Beijing. “With such significant upsides, you are also potentially looking at a scenario where companies are more willing to adapt to Chinese net controls to gain access to the market.”
China’s digital economy grew much faster than national GDP in 2019, underscoring its significance to future growth, the Chinese Academy of Information and Communications Technology said.
Market researcher International Data Corp projected that China would hold about one-third of the world’s data by 2025, or roughly 48.6 zettabytes — about 60 percent more than the US, or equivalent to more than 10 trillion DVDs.
One big challenge would be how to get some of the nation’s biggest holders of data on board. The bluntest way would be to seize their data outright, which some hardliners have suggested.
Zhao Yanqing (趙燕菁), a professor at Xiamen University’s School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, made the case for nationalizing the data of big tech giants at a Chinese economic forum. Since China blocked foreign firms like Google and Facebook, local companies like Alibaba and Tencent received a benefit that should now be shared with society, he said.
“Only by establishing public ownership for platforms can we ‘tame’ capital,” Zhao said, according to a transcript published by the nationalistic news site Guancha.
Still, most analysts view that as unlikely. While Xi has a long history of knocking back billionaires who could pose a threat to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), he also wants to find a way to ensure growth is more evenly distributed among the nation’s 1.4 billion people. Although China is a one-party state, the party has staked its legitimacy in part on hitting targets for improved living standards — and a booming digital economy is key to success.
Nationalizing data could quickly backfire, stifling innovation at a time Xi needs technological breakthroughs as the US works with allies to prevent China from obtaining advanced computer chips.
“You need companies that are very competitive,” said Liu Lizhi (劉立志), an assistant professor at Georgetown University who has written about data politics in China. “Nationalization of data would hurt the tech companies. If you take away the data, the companies will lose their incentive and their ability to innovate.”
So Chinese officials are focused on crafting legislation on data ownership that addresses concerns from a range of competing interests. Local officials in tech hub Shenzhen might differ with antitrust bureaucrats on how much proprietary data companies must share, while security departments could clash with economic ministries on issues like data security.
Much of the other work involves setting standards for datasets that are not uniform between different entities and provinces. This would allow them to be more easily used on new data exchanges, such as the one launched in Beijing that aims to allow companies to trade anonymous proprietary data — effectively a pilot for a national data trading system.
So far, similar projects set up in past years in cities like Shanghai and Guiyang in southern Guizhou Province have only received tepid reception, partly because they are disconnected from each other and only hold small pools of data. While it is crucial for big tech platforms and other private companies to buy in to the exchanges, the still-evolving regulatory framework is putting many players off.
“Data in China is very fragmented and lacks common standards, which makes it difficult and expensive to exploit,” said Camille Boullenois, a consultant with Europe-based Sinolytics. “Drafting standards and encouraging cross-provincial databases will help incentivize data trade.”
Until recently, Chinese lawmakers focused mostly on security. A 2017 law gave authorities the right to access to almost all private data when necessary and demanded foreign firms store data from Chinese customers locally, forcing Apple Inc to open a data center with local officials.
China’s leaders are now focused on using big data to help governments provide better services. Firefighters can use it to respond to calls quicker, while data from hospitals can help track citizens and stem the spread of COVID-19. It would form the foundation of everything from smart cities to financial regulation to surveillance operations against political dissidents.
The Chinese government is developing a digital yuan that would compete with Ant Group Co’s Alipay and Tencent’s WeChat Pay, which together account for nearly all of the mobile-payments market, allowing the People’s Bank of China to gather enormous amounts of data on transactions. Authorities have also made significant advances with a system for measuring the social credit of companies on everything from tax payments to environmental protection to product quality.
For now, Chinese authorities have said they would not force companies to hand over data. On a trip this month to the Guiyang data center, a local CCP official told Bloomberg that companies are mostly concerned they would lose their competitive edge if they part ways with an essential resource.
“With regard to the use, development and trade of data, we’re still exploring the mechanisms,” Guizhou Provincial Big Data Development Administration Deputy Director-General Hu Jianhua (胡建華) said. “For enterprises, they have the ownership of the data. We encourage them to make their data open, but not force them to do so.”
One possible solution is for the government to become coinvestors with the companies. Bloomberg reported last month that China proposed establishing a joint venture led by the People’s Bank of China with local technology giants that would oversee the data they collect from hundreds of millions of consumers.
The Financial Times on Friday last week reported that Ant Group is resisting such a proposal, which risks facing the same obstacles as when Tencent and Alibaba reportedly refused to share data with the central bank several years ago after it set up credit scoring company Baihang.
Data privacy is the “biggest obstacle” the government faces in dealing with the tech giants, said Angela Zhang (張湖月), author of Chinese Antitrust Exceptionalism and director of the Centre for Chinese Law at the University of Hong Kong. “There is an inherent tension between protecting consumer privacy and promoting competition among different platforms.”
Executives at China’s biggest firms have sought to blunt the damage from Xi’s crackdown.
After the Alibaba probe wrapped up, chief executive officer Daniel Zhang (張勇) told investors that the company would continue to work with regulators on data privacy. Earlier this month, companies including JD.com Inc and Meituan pledged to play fair in data usage after Guangzhou antitrust regulators summoned them to a meeting. Robin Li (李彥宏), chairman and CEO of top search company Baidu Inc, last month proposed to top Chinese lawmakers a pilot program to break up barriers in data flows among Internet companies.
The companies’ reactions show they are spooked after years of limited measures to align with government policies, said Dev Lewis, a research fellow at Digital Asia Hub in Shanghai.
“Now that mirage has been lifted,” he said. “The onus is now firmly on the platform if they want to reinstate that. They need to take the initiative on the data front.”
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
RSS