Space technology development is an increasingly important and emerging sector. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has emphasized the importance of the sector and identified it as one component of the government’s “six core strategic industries.”
On Feb. 18, the government approved a draft bill regulating space-based activities, promoting the development of space-related industries, and decoupling the National Space Organization from the Ministry of Science and Technology and making it an independent agency.
One aim would be to enable Taiwan-made rockets to launch locally made satellites, to enhance data-gathering capabilities on weather patterns, create images for meteorological applications and better forecast weather events.
Taiwan has dipped its toe in the space sector with its Formosat program, with the first satellite launched in 1999. The most recent, the Formasat-7 constellation, was launched in 2019.
Even though the involvement of Taiwan-made components and competencies has increased, and Taiwanese universities and large electronics firms have long been involved in the development of spacecraft components, subsystems and payloads, the components were often produced for one-off projects and were not commercialized, relying instead on public funding. If Taiwan wants to become more self-reliant, not only in hardware, but also in skills and training, it needs to take a more systematic and scaled-up approach. This is the objective of the latest push.
One way to do this would be to collaborate with other countries with more advanced competencies. In the current climate, India would be a good partner, for several reasons:
First, there are the existing affinities. India is one of the countries targeted by the government’s New Southbound Policy, and the two countries have warm relations, aided by shared concerns over an adversarial China. The two countries also have a need to develop sophisticated weather tracking technologies and skillsets, and India has a developed space sector, with proven space programs.
Working together on these projects would not only benefit Taiwan’s ability to develop hardware, and cultivate talent and competencies in an emerging sector, it would contribute to expertise in another, much-needed application of the technology: national defense.
For more than two decades, China has been developing space-based intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities that can now compete with those of the US. It has advanced capabilities, with military reconnaissance satellites supporting geospatial intelligence capabilities that enable it to see at night and through clouds. These technologies are crucial in the approach to potential conflict to monitor and assess what a hostile party is doing, in terms of deployment and positioning, location of production capabilities, and patterns of behavior.
Should conflict break out, they would be crucial for providing intelligence on troop movements, damage assessment, and also on supporting information such as telecommunications, navigation and weather.
It is also important to promote training of competency in researching, developing and manufacturing intelligence-gathering capabilities, as well as the ability to analyze the intelligence.
However, Taiwan has little hope in catching up with China, not just because of the fewer resources available, but also because of the long lead time that China has accrued.
The government should develop capabilities fine-tuned to Taiwan’s requirements and increase cooperation with other countries to develop local talent, but also avail itself of the increasingly sophisticated commercial options in the interim period.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS