‘Salmon chaos’
In the past week, more than 100 Taiwanese have inundated household registration offices nationwide with applications to change their name to include the Chinese word for “salmon” after Japanese sushi restaurant chain Akindo Sushiro promised free unlimited sushi to anyone with the word in their name.
Local media have dubbed the phenomenon “salmon chaos,” and many international media outlets have also picked up the story.
This bizarre name-change craze is more than just an amusing talking point: There are some serious aspects worthy of further analysis.
First, these people are not choosing to change their names for conceptual reasons, or due to their social or family networks. For the period of time the new name exists on said person’s identification document, the holder of the document is unlikely to use “salmon” as a self-referential or a pronoun during interaction with their lover, spouses, children, parents, relatives, friends or colleagues.
A person’s new name, or “code,” is not solely restricted to that which is written on their identity document.
Their old name might still be used within different social networks and by relatives.
Furthermore, a person’s real name is often accompanied by one or more nicknames, which are reserved for use by their most intimate circle of friends and family members.
What has really changed, albeit in a transient sense, is the “code” that is used for mutual recognition between an individual and the state.
In other words, the impact of this craze should be considered in terms of the extent to which it inconveniences the individual’s interaction with others and the state for the duration of the change, as well as the potential risk of burning through the maximum permitted three changes within a person’s lifetime.
Taiwan’s “salmon chaos” can be viewed as a rational choice, although this “can” need not convey approval, nor does it mean that every instance of a “salmon” name change was a rational choice.
That is, the issue of one’s name and its relation to the state also sheds light on the plight of Taiwan’s Aborigines and the second-class status that they hold in today’s society. This is perhaps something the government should reflect upon.
Lu Yu-ren
Chiayi County
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS