Over dinner in a busy barbecue restaurant in Shenzhen, Lei Yong and Zhao Xu, two businessmen in their mid-40s, reflect on how meat consumption in China has dramatically changed in their lifetimes, particularly over the past 10 to 15 years.
“Maybe 20 years ago, people in villages and smaller cities didn’t eat much meat, but those in big cities did,” says Zhao, referring to the bustling megacity in which he and Lei are raising their families. “Now people in bigger cities are more health conscious and are eating more vegetables, but those in smaller cities have more money. Now they’re really eating a lot more meat. They think that being rich means eating more meat.”
Ravenous demand from China has helped Brazilian beef sales rocket to record levels — but the boom comes at a high environmental cost.
Brazil’s economy has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic, and more than two million people have lost their jobs, but agriculture continues to flourish, and the country is the world’s biggest beef exporter.
Brazil supplied 43 percent of China’s meat imports last year, the consultancy Safras & Mercado calculated using government data, with beef exports to the country up a staggering 76 percent last year compared with 2019.
“There has been this boom,” University of Sao Paulo professor of agribusiness Thiago de Carvalho says, highlighting the quality of Brazilian beef and its low price after the Brazilian currency, the real, tumbled last year. “Brazilian meat is [among] the cheapest in the world.”
Sales are predicted to climb even higher this year, as China’s pork industry struggles to recover from the deadly pig disease African swine fever.
“China’s need to buy meat last year was impressive,” says Fernando Iglesias, an analyst at Safras & Mercado, which translates as Harvests and Market. “Brazil is more than able to supply what the Chinese need.”
SWINE FEVER
Although the Chinese eat less meat per head of population than Americans, consumption has risen in recent decades as the economy grows. Traditionally, China’s favorite meat is pork, but in 2018 and 2019 more than half of the country’s 440 million pigs were killed by African swine fever or slaughtered to slow its spread. Beef imports rose as China sought to replace the protein.
Consumer surveys also show more Chinese turning to beef. A poll of affluent Chinese consumers by the marketing company Meat & Livestock Australia found that a third had eaten more beef during the past year.
Almost 70 percent of China’s Brazilian meat imports came from the Cerrado, the vast tropical savanna region, and the Amazon in 2017, according to Trase (Transparency for Sustainable Economies), a European network that monitors supply chains. About half of the Cerrado and about 20 percent of the Brazilian Amazon have been cleared — with a devastating impact on global heating as both are important carbon sinks.
“The Amazon provided about a fifth of China’s imports but is actually half of the deforestation risk,” says Erasmus zu Ermgassen, a researcher at Louvain Catholic University in Belgium and one of the authors of a study on the impact of beef exports.
“Exports are expanding into the Amazon,” Zu Ermgassen says. “When you increase demand on the Brazilian agriculture system you are pushing agriculture farther into the forest.”
SLAUGHTERHOUSES
Since 2019, China has reportedly licensed 22 Brazilian slaughterhouses for exports — 14 of them in the Amazon, while four are in the sprawling Amazon state of Para, which has Brazil’s fifth-largest cattle herd.
This had a big impact on the price of meat, says Mauricio Fraga Filho, a cattle rancher and president of Para’s ranchers’ association.
Under far-right, populist Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who took office in January 2019, Amazon deforestation has surged to a 12-year high. Investors and large Brazilian companies have pressured the Brazilian government to act, and ranchers such as Fraga Filho are worried about potential boycotts.
“This is a big concern,” Fraga Filho says. “The market shouldn’t bar products from the Amazon. This will be chaos.”
He says more effort should be put into helping farmers resolve legal problems, such as land embargoed due to environmental offenses, enabling them to supply meat companies legally. This would stop them selling to a black market that “exists and has always existed,” Fraga Filho says. “Today there is no need to deforest anymore.”
Brazil’s big three beef exporters — JBS, Marfrig and Minerva — handled 72 percent of Brazil’s beef exports from 2015 to 2017, according to Trase. All three have spent heavily developing systems to monitor their “direct suppliers” — farmers such as Fraga Filho who sell on to slaughterhouses — for environmental offenses, but they have been unable to monitor their “indirect suppliers” — farms breeding or raising cattle that supply the “direct suppliers.”
Last year, JBS and Marfrig promised complete monitoring of their supply chain by 2025 and Minerva is testing a system to control its suppliers.
While China has yet to show concern over the connection between Brazilian beef imports and Amazon deforestation, there are at least signs that its government wants to cut meat consumption, which would improve public health and reduce carbon emissions. In September last year, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) surprised many when he said China would aim to become carbon neutral by 2060.
However, while the market for plant-based alternatives is growing, weaning people off meat — and the sense of wealth that it brings — may prove harder than he expects.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
RSS