More than 600 days after Taiwan’s landmark legalization of same-sex marriage, the government is finally addressing a longstanding issue: transnational marriages. Taiwanese still cannot legally marry a same-sex partner from a country where same-sex marriage is not recognized. There are only 29 countries that recognize such unions, making the provision still rather restrictive, and Taiwan is reportedly the only one that has such measures.
The issue has been repeatedly brought up by LGBTQ groups before and after same-sex marriage was legalized, and it continues to cast a shadow on LGBTQ and human rights in Asia. Countless couples have featured in articles about how one partner is struggling to stay in Taiwan. The Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights (TAPCPR) says there are more than 300 such couples.
The situation has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic due to travel restrictions, leading to long periods of separation. Some people are forced to remain in Taiwan as eternal students, and others resort to methods that are financially and psychologically draining, and in some cases, illegal.
One of the notable cases leading up to the 2017 constitutional interpretation that paved the way for the legalization of same-sex marriage involved Jacques Piroux, a French national who committed suicide in 2016 after being unable to make any medical decisions on behalf of his dying partner of 35 years, and had no rights to the property they shared. This is considered an influential case that ushered in the government’s eventual decision, but if Piroux was from a country that did not recognize same-sex marriage (France does), the current law would have meant absolutely nothing to him.
The Judicial Yuan on Friday last week finally approved draft revisions to the Act Governing the Choice of Law in Civil Matters Involving Foreign Elements (涉外民事法律適用法), which would grant recognition to all same-sex marriages — except for those involving a partner from China (excluding Hong Kong and Macau).
“Nobody can put limits on love,” the Judicial Yuan said.
While Taiwanese-Chinese marriages are subject to different laws, such couples make up a sizeable portion of same-sex transnational couples, according to a BBC article published last year.
According to the TAPCPR, while the law does not technically prohibit same-sex marriage between Taiwanese and Chinese, such couples still cannot get married because part of the procedure requires them to register in China, which does not recognize same-sex marriage. There are tens of thousands of heterosexual Chinese spouses in Taiwan, but there is nothing same-sex couples can do. Is there a way to work around this? Nothing has been mentioned so far.
The requirement that the couple first register in the partner’s home country also applies to 22 other nations, but again this is not possible if the country — such as Thailand — does not recognize same-sex marriage. The Judicial Yuan said that couples could go to a third country to get married there first, and then come back and register, but not everyone can easily do that.
Another major problem that LGBTQ groups have brought up is that the law does not cover foreign residents in Taiwan who want to marry another foreigner: One party must be Taiwanese. There are two other versions of the draft amendment that do include foreign couples, but unfortunately the Judicial Yuan seems to be going with the one that does not.
While the draft is a step forward regarding human rights in Taiwan, many couples are still left out of the loop.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this