More than 600 days after Taiwan’s landmark legalization of same-sex marriage, the government is finally addressing a longstanding issue: transnational marriages. Taiwanese still cannot legally marry a same-sex partner from a country where same-sex marriage is not recognized. There are only 29 countries that recognize such unions, making the provision still rather restrictive, and Taiwan is reportedly the only one that has such measures.
The issue has been repeatedly brought up by LGBTQ groups before and after same-sex marriage was legalized, and it continues to cast a shadow on LGBTQ and human rights in Asia. Countless couples have featured in articles about how one partner is struggling to stay in Taiwan. The Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights (TAPCPR) says there are more than 300 such couples.
The situation has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic due to travel restrictions, leading to long periods of separation. Some people are forced to remain in Taiwan as eternal students, and others resort to methods that are financially and psychologically draining, and in some cases, illegal.
One of the notable cases leading up to the 2017 constitutional interpretation that paved the way for the legalization of same-sex marriage involved Jacques Piroux, a French national who committed suicide in 2016 after being unable to make any medical decisions on behalf of his dying partner of 35 years, and had no rights to the property they shared. This is considered an influential case that ushered in the government’s eventual decision, but if Piroux was from a country that did not recognize same-sex marriage (France does), the current law would have meant absolutely nothing to him.
The Judicial Yuan on Friday last week finally approved draft revisions to the Act Governing the Choice of Law in Civil Matters Involving Foreign Elements (涉外民事法律適用法), which would grant recognition to all same-sex marriages — except for those involving a partner from China (excluding Hong Kong and Macau).
“Nobody can put limits on love,” the Judicial Yuan said.
While Taiwanese-Chinese marriages are subject to different laws, such couples make up a sizeable portion of same-sex transnational couples, according to a BBC article published last year.
According to the TAPCPR, while the law does not technically prohibit same-sex marriage between Taiwanese and Chinese, such couples still cannot get married because part of the procedure requires them to register in China, which does not recognize same-sex marriage. There are tens of thousands of heterosexual Chinese spouses in Taiwan, but there is nothing same-sex couples can do. Is there a way to work around this? Nothing has been mentioned so far.
The requirement that the couple first register in the partner’s home country also applies to 22 other nations, but again this is not possible if the country — such as Thailand — does not recognize same-sex marriage. The Judicial Yuan said that couples could go to a third country to get married there first, and then come back and register, but not everyone can easily do that.
Another major problem that LGBTQ groups have brought up is that the law does not cover foreign residents in Taiwan who want to marry another foreigner: One party must be Taiwanese. There are two other versions of the draft amendment that do include foreign couples, but unfortunately the Judicial Yuan seems to be going with the one that does not.
While the draft is a step forward regarding human rights in Taiwan, many couples are still left out of the loop.
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
China last week announced that it picked two Pakistani astronauts for its Tiangong space station mission, indicating the maturation of the two nations’ relationship from terrestrial infrastructure cooperation to extraterrestrial strategic domains. For Taiwan and India, the developments present an opportunity for democratic collaboration in space, particularly regarding dual-use technologies and the normative frameworks for outer space governance. Sino-Pakistani space cooperation dates back to the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, with a cooperative agreement between the Pakistani Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission, and the Chinese Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Space cooperation was integrated into the China-Pakistan
RSS