“As the world is no longer placid, TSMC is gaining a vital position with strategic importance,” Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) told TSMC employees at the company’s annual sports event in November 2019. Leadership in technology, manufacturing excellence and customer trust are the key factors to safeguard TSMC’s competitive edge, Chang said.
Chang’s words have been proven true, as the Japanese government is eager to convince TSMC to set up advanced manufacturing facilities there, with the aim of rejuvenating Japan’s lagging chip industry and fending off competition from China.
TSMC was the first foundry to offer 5-nanometer technology, and is also to become the first to offer 3-nanometer technology when it becomes available next year.
Dashing Tokyo’s hopes, TSMC on Thursday last week said that it is evaluating the feasibility of setting up an advanced material development center in Japan, not an advanced manufacturing fab like the one it plans to build in the US.
Washington last year convinced TSMC to build a US$12 billion plant in the US to produce advanced chips, as semiconductors are becoming vital to national security amid the technology race with China. TSMC plans to begin construction of the fab in Arizona this year and produce 5-nanometer chips there starting in 2024.
The financing for the US fab is included in TSMC’s record-high capital expenditure budget of US$28 billion for this year, the chipmaker said.
The US has blocked China’s access to advanced semiconductor technology by blacklisting a series of Chinese firms — including Huawei Technologies Inc and Xiaomi Corp, as well as 60 firms linked to the People’s Liberation Army — and through TSMC has obtained local semiconductor capacity without risking national security.
TSMC plays a vital role in the semiconductor industry’s supply chain, primarily due to its technological leadership. Its long-term goal used to be to catch up with chip giant Intel Corp in developing next-generation technologies. TSMC has completed that mission and last year surpassed Intel by offering 5-nanometer chips.
TSMC is reportedly to receive orders from Intel to make new central processing units in the second half of this year, beating Samsung Electronics Co to the punch.
TSMC’s other key clients include Apple Inc, AMD Inc and Nvidia Inc. The company said that its huge capital expenditure budget would help satisfy demand from these three, as 5G smartphones and high-performance computing applications are gaining traction.
Investors have approved TSMC’s growth strategy of expanding investment in cutting-edge technologies.
TSMC’s share price jumped 1 percent to NT$607 yesterday, taking the company’s market value to NT$15.74 trillion (US$552.47 billion). It overtook Berkshire Hathaway Inc’s market value of US$547.36 billion, enabling it to secure the No. 10 spot among the world’s top 10 most valuable firms. Over the past year, TSMC’s share price has soared more than 82 percent, helping the TAIEX to gain 29 percent. No wonder TSMC is nicknamed “a sacred mountain” by local investors.
TSMC is not the only Taiwanese company that is making a big impact on the world’s supply chains. Another is 5G mobile phone chipmaker MediaTek Inc, which has overtaken rival Qualcomm Inc to become the world’s largest supplier of handset chips. Other local manufacturers are also showing their strength in offering advanced technologies and quality products during the COVID-19 pandemic, thanks to Taiwan’s containment of the disease.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS