Before his tenure ends on Wednesday, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Jan. 9 gave Taiwan another diplomatic gift by lifting the restrictions on contacts between senior US government officials and their Taiwanese counterparts. The effect on the relationship between Taiwan, China and the US remains to be seen.
Pompeo is the general of US President Donald Trump’s opposition to China. Last year, Pompeo gave a speech on US China policy titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future” at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, calling on the world’s democracies to work together to restrain the rise of China, as its communist ideology is in contrast to Western democratic values. In a sense, his speech was a declaration of a new cold war.
The US Department of State’s announcements are significant. The cancelation of the self-imposed restrictions on contacts between the two nation’s governments means that the Taiwanese president, vice president, premier, foreign and defense ministers might all have the chance to visit Washington. This would raise the level of exchanges between US and Taiwanese officials.
The question is why Pompeo made the announcement about two weeks before leaving office.
In the past, the US restricted its officials from having contacts with Taiwanese officials whose position symbolize Taiwanese sovereignty. Pompeo claimed that the restrictions had been aimed to pacify Beijing, as they are based on the “one China” policy the US imposed when establishing diplomatic ties with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), allowing for only unofficial ties with Taiwan based on the US’ Taiwan Relations Act.
However, the US Congress in 2018 passed the Taiwan Travel Act, expressing the hope that the US government would boost the level of exchanges with Taiwan.
If Pompeo intended to fulfill the Taiwan Travel Act, he could have done so a year or two earlier. To be blunt, he might have worried that lifting the restrictions would affect US-China relations.
The symbolism far outweighs the meaning of the move made in his last few days in office. Pompeo is trying to leave a legacy without having to take responsibility.
Whether US president-elect Joe Biden’s administration will follow up on the move is beyond Pompeo’s control. If actions taken by the new administration lead to strong protest on the part of Beijing, and further deterioration of US-China relations, Pompeo will not have to deal with the problem.
Trump and his staff seem to have the same idea. Take, for example, the various sanctions on Chinese companies: They were imposed to restrict future US-China relations. On the one hand, the sanctions are seen as a consequence of the US-China trade dispute, but on the other, they narrow the options for the Biden administration in dealing with Beijing.
Whether the Biden administration will follow up on Pompeo’s move is uncertain. Answering questions from the media about the move, a member of Biden’s transition team said that the president-elect would fully abide by the Taiwan Relations Act and the “one China” policy. That stance is in line with that of previous US administrations, and it does not comment on the dropped restrictions.
The Biden administration will obviously not want to be tied by the Trump administration’s farewell gifts. How Washington handles its relations with China and Taiwan will be decided based on what the situation looks like after Biden’s inauguration on Wednesday.
Wang Kao-cheng is a professor in the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS