After spending 11 years and almost NT$60 billion (US$2.1 billion), the Taichung City Government last month finally announced that the Green Line of the Taichung MRT rail system had been completed and trial runs could begin.
Less than a week into the test runs, a coupling broke and the trials were put on hold, causing a political storm as the city government said it would demand compensation from the Taipei City Government, which together with Taichung and the Ministry of Transportation and Communications in 2008 signed an agreement designating them executor of the project.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taichung City Councilor Chang Yao-chung (張耀中) said that although Kawasaki Heavy Industries, the Japanese firm responsible for manufacturing the trains, had commissioned US-based Wabtec to make the coupling, it had been supplied by its factory in China.
Chang said the coupling was not strong enough, demanding that the Taichung Transportation Bureau investigate.
He also asked if the US company had breached its contract by using its Chinese factory to make the couplings, but said he doubted it would be possible to demand compensation, and therefore called for the provisional seizure of Kawasaki property.
The Taipei Department of Rapid Transit Systems said that although Kawasaki had ordered the couplings, which were assembled in Japan and sent to Taiwan, Wabtec was responsible for quality control.
China in the past 20 years has made massive investments aimed at developing its railway industry, and it has made ambitious attempts to grab market share from Japan, France and Germany.
However, despite seizing market share with the help of favorable loans and low prices, Chinese-made trains and rail products are of inferior quality.
One example is the 35 train cars that Singapore had to replace in 2016 after they developed cracks. The cars were allegedly secretly recalled as Singapore and Chinese authorities classified the information as confidential.
The same year, the Philippines bought 48 Chinese light rail cars for 3.8 billion pesos (US$79.15 million at the current exchange rate). Due to flaws in the signaling system and other problems, the cars have never been put into operation. The Philippines planned to arrange for third-party tests and considered returning the cars for failing to meet quality requirements.
Also in 2016, Hong Kong’s MTR rail system bought 17 cars from CRRC Changchun Railway Vehicles for HK$1.14 billion (US$147 million at the current exchange rate), but because they resemble the older Japanese SP1900 cars, they were ridiculed by train enthusiasts.
These cars started operating on the Ma On Shan Line in 2017 together with Japanese-made cars, but in March last year, they were transferred to the West Rail Line. When leaving Tuen Mun Station toward Mei Foo Station, and less than three hours after they started operating, passengers were reportedly asked to disembark and the train was taken offline.
Some have said that passengers were asked to disembark because the train needed to return to the depot due to a signaling system failure. Hong Kong Internet users commented that Chinese-made cars would break down after half a day, and that this was to be expected.
The Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) has invested NT$25.3 billion in what has been called the world’s most beautiful and longest local train, the EMU900 from South Korean company Hyundai Rotem. It was criticized for several flaws, such as loose handles that were improperly welded, holes in the door panels and mistakes in the information system.
The TRA later showed that the holes in the door panels were scratches in the black tape used to mark the door panels, and said that handles only needed to be solid and safe and there was no need for them to be welded.
In response to claims that many parts in the train were Chinese-made, the TRA said that most of the equipment was not, adding that they would continue to monitor the situation with independent German third-party certification company TUV Rheinland, while demanding that Hyundai Rotem correct all issues that show up during testing.
It seems that as soon as China is involved in a railway, problems arise. The government has spent huge sums developing the railway transportation system and it must make sure that Chinese-made products do not create problems. Suppliers should not be allowed to “do as they wish” lest the government’s credibility suffers — or worse, the public’s safety is endangered.
John Yu is a civil servant.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS