On Dec. 11, CTi News’ last day of broadcasting after its license renewal was denied by the National Communications Commission, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) held what they billed as an international news conference.
Wearing black suits to mark the gravity of the situation, they said that they were mourning the death of freedom of speech in Taiwan.
During their opening remarks, both had to deal with faulty microphones, with the signal sporadically being dropped and their voices intermittently silenced. They took it in good humor, but appeared to miss the joke, although it did serve to add symbolism to the proceedings.
It was not so much the symbolism of their freedom of expression being stifled: It was more the theatrical flair of the occasion, because — make no mistake — this was less about the issue at hand and more about the KMT’s long game of trying to portray President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as a wannabe dictator and her administration as a fledgling party-state autocracy.
Invoking the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Chiang said that the government was suppressing freedom of speech and abusing the state apparatus to this end, likening the commission to a secret police working under Tsai’s direction. He talked of how Taiwan was on the path to a “dictatorship,” a word he used liberally during the news conference to refer to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and to Tsai.
Following Chiang’s comments, Ma was handed a faulty mic and started lamenting the state of affairs, saying: “This is a one-party autocracy and a one-woman dictatorship,” which had pushed freedom of speech “to the abyss.”
Clearly, “dictator,” “dictatorship,” “autocracy” and “stifling of freedom of speech” were the keywords of the day. In that regard, it was job well done for Ma and Chiang.
The issue of US pork imports containing ractopamine residue has been another platform the KMT has jumped on to get its message across.
Chiang on Tuesday accused the DPP of using “the tyranny of its [legislative] majority” to “crush public opinion” and push through a vote on directives regarding the US pork and beef import policy.
If anyone knows anything about Taiwanese politics, including how the KMT has conducted itself previously when it had a legislative majority, they would understand how disingenuous a claim this was. Still, it did not matter how many people bought it, as Chiang did what he needed to do, which was to notch up another keyword: “tyranny.”
The issues that the KMT purports to care about are worth exploring. Freedom of expression is a fragile thing that needs constant monitoring, and there still is no scientific consensus on the long-term health effects of eating meat with traces of ractopamine. However, the KMT is broaching these issues in bad faith, with its eyes on a different prize: a return to political power, by conjuring up a false portrayal of the DPP overseeing a one-party state orchestrated by a dictator jealously guarding her grip on the presidency.
Former Taipei Veterans General Hospital physician Su Wei-shuo (蘇偉碩) is under investigation for circulating falsehoods about the health risks of ractopamine. He has in the past made some pretty far-fetched statements, saying that it was 250 times more toxic than ecstasy and that if it were to be imported into the ecosystem, the air would be infused with it, “so that people will inhale it just by breathing.”
Su has walked back some of his more excessive statements, yet the KMT supported him, painting him as another victim of a “dictatorial” administration, with Chiang writing on Facebook that the DPP’s behavior risks turning Taiwan into a “false democracy and a true dictatorship.”
There goes that keyword again.
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS