Taiwan-US relations
US Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler is to visit Taiwan in the beginning of next month.
This would be the third top-level US visit in the past few months, following US Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar in August and US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach in September.
Some people have reacted to these visits by disparagingly describing them as “graduation trips,” in an attempt to play down the importance of the close relationship between the US and Taiwanese administrations.
One cannot help but wonder if these people have such a shallow understanding of international affairs, or if they do not want Taiwan to do well or have good relations with the US.
On Nov. 7, 2015, then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore. The meeting made the headlines, and a proud Ma still praises it as one of the achievements of his presidency.
However, a simple look at the timing of the meeting shows that it took place a bit more than six months before he had to step down, on May 20, 2016, and a mere three months ahead of the presidential election on Jan. 16, 2016. Add the fact that it was already becoming apparent that there would be a change in government.
Following the logic of those talking about “graduation trips,” surely the meeting between Ma and Xi was Ma’s graduation trip, especially as it carried no particular significance.
The US is Taiwan’s most important ally. Any possibility to cause relations between the two to advance further is a possibility that Taiwan must grasp.
As long as the two countries agree that they are in the same boat, there should be no need for any acid, sarcastic remarks.
Huang Wei-ping
Kaohsiung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing