This year would be remembered as the year that COVID-19 brought most of the world to a virtual standstill, and the year of a momentous US presidential election.
In Taiwan, while many are watching international events, people are also casting a glance over the history of their own island. Tainan is preparing to commemorate 400 years of its founding, Taipei has marked its own centenary with the “Journey of a Century” exhibition and Kaohsiung is putting on a series of events to celebrate 100 years since it adopted its new name.
It is wholly commendable that Taiwanese are exploring their history, taking the time to remember the hard work of their forebears and reflecting on what these all mean for how they are to march on into the future.
Tainan started its life in 1624, when the Dutch built a fort at Tayuan (大員), the present day Anping District (安平), initially calling it Orange City before changing the name to Zeelandia. This was Taiwan’s first-ever fortified stronghold, from where the Dutch governed the island, which would also become a hub for overseas trade.
Later, the Ming Dynasty warlord Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) would use this fort as his own base. Now called Anping Fort, it has also been called Wangcheng (王城, “royal city”), Anping City and Taiwan City.
To commemorate its 400-year history, Tainan is holding a series of archeological, installation, cultural and folk events, in cooperation with exhibitions across Taiwan and overseas, to show the city’s image and Taiwan’s national brand on the international stage, all in anticipation of the next four centuries.
Taipei’s centenary celebrations marked the initial implementation of Taiwan’s city system in 1920 as the location of the Japanese colonial era Sootokufu, the Office of the Governor-General of Taihoku Prefecture, when the city was named Taihoku.
The city was established at the same time as Taichuu (present day Taichung) and Tainan: Takao (present day Kaohsiung) and Kiryuu (now named Keelung) were not to be built for another four years.
As the provincial capital was Taipei, it had a similar status for Taiwan as the imperial capital in Tokyo had in Japan, and was also known as the “island capital.” After World War II, the Japanese-era city system was retained, and is still used today.
Kaohsiung was originally named Takau by the Makatao people, meaning “bamboo grove.” Later, Han Chinese immigrants would transliterate this name to the Chinese characters dagou (打狗, meaning “to hit a dog”). In 1920, during the Japanese colonial period, those characters were changed to the Chinese characters still used today, after Takao, an area in the environs of Kyoto, which sounded similar to dagou in Japanese and had an auspicious meaning of “flying high, overlooking the south seas.”
This year, the city is putting on a series of events based on the three themes of its history, its port and Kaohsiung’s prospects, allowing its residents to tell their own story and write their own history, with a view to a glorious 100 more years.
After the war, Taiwan came under the control of an external regime, which suppressed its history and local culture, preventing many people from coming to know the rich cultural heritage of this land. Now that Taiwan is a democracy, events such as those described above make it once more possible for Taiwanese to appreciate the contributions of those who came before, and understand how modern-day Taiwan evolved and what this means for the future.
There is much to learn from how Tainan, Kaohsiung and Taipei developed.
For a start, Taiwan’s history and culture is made up of elements from Aborigines, the Dutch, Chinese and Japanese. These constituent parts might have had a larger or a smaller impact, for a longer or shorter period, but they — together with Fort San Domingo bequeathed by the Spanish, missionary work undertaken by European countries and post-war popular US culture thrown in for good measure — have made Taiwan the diverse culture it is today, and have fed into its rich and unique history and culture.
Next, there is the way the nation has developed, from south to the north. Taiwan was the origin of the Austronesian-language cultural diaspora, developing advanced maritime technologies that allowed its people to trade overseas and emigrate to other parts of the region.
During the 17th century Age of Discovery, the Dutch established their regional base in Taiwan, introducing aspects of Western civilization, such as literacy and Christianity.
When Koxinga arrived, and with the Qing Dynasty in China, Tainan would become a cultural city, the seat of learning on the island, the place where culture and education first developed, and where the arts were assembled.
In the late 19th century, Taipei gradually took on more importance.
Taiwanese politicians are often criticized for always taking the short-term view. Taking a step back and looking at the way these cities have developed over the centuries, and what taking the long-term view can produce, is exactly what is required.
Kaohsiung’s radiating and grid street layout plan and Taipei’s Daan Forest Park — the “lungs of the city” — date back to the Japanese colonial period, when in the 1930s a 30-year urban planning project was initiated in Kaohsiung, and 17 large city parks were planned for Taipei.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) initially announced plans for a 50-year infrastructure and reinvigoration plan for Taipei, but thus far there has been more talk than action.
A perspective on urban planning is not the only thing to be gained from an overview of Taiwan’s history. Next year is the centenary of the establishment of the Taiwanese Cultural Association by democracy pioneers such as Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) and the Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament started by Lin Hsien-tang (林獻堂), as well as the 360th anniversary of Koxinga’s landing on Taiwan at Luermen (鹿耳門) in Tainan. Commemorating these events sheds a light on the contribution of individuals in the past to Taiwan’s development, and can serve as inspiration for Taiwanese today.
At the same time, many schools in the past few years have held centennial celebrations marking the establishment of public schools, heralding the era of universal state education for Taiwanese, a milestone in the enlightenment of ordinary people and the modernization of the country.
The arts also have much to offer in this regard, the most recent example of which is the planned Taiwan Trilogy by director Wei Te-sheng (魏德聖). The trilogy is to relate the interaction of three different peoples and cultures during the Age of Discovery, told from the perspective of a Siraya hunter, a Chinese pirate and a Dutch missionary.
For the movies, sets are to be made of Chikan (赤崁) and Dawan (大灣) in Tainan, the Wankan (魍港) Pirate Village in Chiayi County and Madou Village of the Siraya. Wei has said that the sets would be faithful to the Taiwan experience and will not resemble Disneyland sets.
As the English Renaissance statesman and philosopher Francis Bacon wrote: “Histories make men wise.” Armed with knowledge about their nation’s past, Taiwanese would be better prepared to face the challenges presented to them.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the