Last month, 47,573 lottery winners in Shenzhen, China, were each paid 200 yuan (US$29.90 at the current exchange rate) via digital transfers directly into their smartphones. They had to spend the money within one week at 3,389 participating stores in the city’s Luohu District — and spend they did, shelling out 8.8 million yuan in 62,788 transactions.
The experiment showcasing China’s Digital Currency/Electronic Payment (DCEP) system was the latest and flashiest in a series of trials since April for the new “digital yuan.”
Many observers have been raising the alarm over what they see as an escalation of Beijing’s campaign to challenge the dominance of the US dollar, although this is not the program’s only goal.
While there is cause for concern, it is important to understand Beijing’s intentions to create effective mitigation strategies.
In the short term, the effects of the DCEP are to be local and only present a minor departure from the norm, although in the long run it could bring millions of people around the world under Chinese Communist Party (CCP) control.
Similar to cryptocurrencies, DCEP transactions can occur between two users through digital wallets without requiring a bank account. However, unlike cryptocurrencies, it is issued and backed by the People’s Bank of China, making it more stable and immune to speculation.
China’s monetary landscape is already dominated by tech firms Tencent and Alibaba, with their respective WeChat Pay and AliPay services, priming Chinese to take up a centralized digital payment system.
By the same token, Tencent and Alibaba’s growing control of the Chinese public’s finances threatens the CCP, even if they are closely regulated. With the DCEP, Beijing could leverage the firms’ technical networks while simultaneously wresting away control.
The system could also do wonders for tackling another looming challenge to domestic stability and therefore CCP rule: financial crime. As all DCEP transactions are recorded, it would make counterfeiting, illegal financing and other crimes nearly impossible.
The other side of the coin is government surveillance. Transactions deemed improper by China could be blocked and dissidents’ digital wallets frozen.
In the medium term, Beijing likely hopes to leverage the DCEP to bypass the SWIFT system, which is heavily influenced by the US and its allies. China in 2015 introduced its own “Cross-Border Interbank Payment System,” although the DCEP appears to be an early move to consolidate yuan primacy in a digital currency-based transfer system.
Most concerning is the long term, which could see the DCEP take over as the primary financial system for underserved people around the world. According to the World Bank, about 1.7 billion adults do not have a bank account, although two-thirds of them have a mobile phone. Many of these people are in places targeted by China’s Belt and Road Initiative. For example, more than 60 percent of Indonesians do not have a bank account, but the nation has more cellphones than people.
With the DCEP, these people would have access to a secure and free banking alternative, allowing them to participate in online commerce and accrue savings. If other actors fail to offer an alternative, the digital yuan could find a foothold across the Belt and Road.
If the DCEP is widely adopted, the CCP would have control over the finances of nearly half the globe. Other nations have shown an interest in creating their own digital currencies, including a consortium with the Bank for International Settlements, but China is clearly vying for the lead.
If other countries drag their feet, and continue to ignore the digital transformation and underserved people, the consequences could be seismic.
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
The Honduran elections seem to have put China on defense. The promises of trade and aid have failed to materialize, industries are frustrated, and leading candidate Salvador Nasralla, who has increased his lead in the polls, has caused Beijing to engage in a surge of activity that appears more like damage control than partnership building. As Nasralla’s momentum has grown, China’s diplomacy, which seems to be dormant since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 2023, has shown several attempts to avoid a reversal if the Liberal or the National party — which also favor Taipei — emerge as winners in the
RSS