To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement.
First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy.
Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn.
Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the attention of the public and his critics. All this achieved was to further damage China’s credibility on the world stage.
If this were not bad enough, much of southwest and northeast China has since June been submerged under water due to catastrophic seasonal flooding.
China appears to be on the brink of collapse.
Faced with intense internal and external pressures, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might be expected to avoid generating fresh disputes. The last thing China needs right now is more chaos.
However, the CCP decided to stir up another hornet’s nest by tampering with the school curriculum in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
A new edict from Beijing requires that all classes taught at schools in the region, except for Mongolian-language classes, must be taught in Mandarin, not the mother tongue of Mongolians.
Unsurprisingly, Mongolians are up in arms over the CCP’s attack on their culture.
Looking from the outside in, the CCP’s actions appear foolhardy: Why are they bringing yet more trouble on themselves?
However, there is more to the CCP’s actions than meets the eye.
In March, the government of the Republic of Mongolia, which Beijing refers to as Outer Mongolia, passed a new national curriculum that requires its schools to teach all classes in traditional Mongolian script, also known as Hudum Mongol bichig, by 2025.
The Republic of Mongolia switched from traditional Mongolian script in 1946 after it gained independence from China, in favor of a Cyrillic script, also known as the Mongolian Cyrillic alphabet.
Official documentation between the Republic of Mongolia and Inner Mongolia is to this day still conducted using Middle Mongol, the language spoken during the 13th and 14th century Mongolian Empire. Middle Mongol remains an official written language recognized by China and the Republic of Mongolia.
In the past, when China’s economy was thriving and its national strength appeared unassailable, the Republic of Mongolia switching back to traditional Mongolian script would likely not have been a big issue for Beijing.
However, with China’s economy a mess and its national strength diminished, the Republic of Mongolia reverting to traditional Mongolian script would, on a cultural level, act as a powerful magnetic pull to Inner Mongolia residents who share a common culture and language.
This would be a nightmare scenario for Beijing. After all, throughout Chinese history, Mongolia has, either directly or indirectly, been the cause of collapse for all of China’s dynasties.
This might still be the case today, with China’s old adversary, Russia, acting as the Republic of Mongolia’s patron.
In 2018, Russia donated a large cache of military equipment to the Republic of Mongolia, as well as providing training for its military officers to help it fend off a Chinese threat.
If Inner Mongolia, under the cultural pull of the Republic of Mongolia, also returned to using traditional Mongolian script in 2025, a Crimea-type situation could occur, where Inner Mongolia would break away culturally from China and move closer to the long-held dream of Mongolians of reuniting their nation.
In such a scenario, a weakened China surrounded on all sides by a US-led alliance of nations, including Taiwan, would be powerless to prevent Inner Mongolia from returning to the Republic of Mongolia.
This is why Beijing has decided to strike first and gain the upper hand. It is destroying the native language of Mongolians in Inner Mongolia in an attempt to sever the cultural ties that bind them to their brethren.
John Yu is a civil servant
Translated by Edward Jones
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s