The General Chamber of Commerce last week urged the government to expand relief funds available to companies affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and lower the threshold for qualification. The chamber’s call came just weeks after the annual white paper from the Taipei-based Chinese National Federation of Industries said that the government’s relief and stimulus measures were inadequate and could be better spent.
Although the Executive Yuan on July 23 approved a special relief package amounting to NT$210 billion (US$7.12 billion) in subsidies for firms hurt by the COVID-19 pandemic and funding for vaccines, its delay in two extraordinary legislative sessions this summer affected the ability of some government agencies to deliver promised subsidies.
The groups’ requests reflect worries that the relief funds are not reaching the companies that need it as border controls and quarantine requirements remain in place, as well as fears that the nation’s economy might need to brace for a tough fourth quarter amid softening demand for Taiwan’s exports, in light of escalating US-China trade tensions and a second global wave of COVID-19 infections coinciding with the peak of influenza season.
Consequently, apart from appealing for more funds, the groups called on the government to issue yet another round of stimulus vouchers, offer tax relief for small and medium-sized businesses, enhance access to corporate financing, and provide an exemption for the 5 percent tax on undistributed earnings as a supporting measure for businesses.
However, is there a need for additional relief? The COVID-19 situation in Taiwan is relatively under control and there was a boom in domestic tourism over the summer helped by the government’s Triple Stimulus Voucher program, which has helped domestic consumption return to normal and the economy gradually recover.
Fitch Ratings on Friday upgraded its forecast for the nation’s economy to annual growth of 1 percent for this year, compared with the 0.2 percent contraction it predicted in June and the government’s GDP growth forecast of 1.56 percent.
Asking for tax cuts is like adding fuel to the fire, further harming the nation’s fiscal situation: Relief programs are being launched as a temporary policy, but any tax cuts would mean long-term reductions in tax revenues and could seriously affect the nation’s fiscal profile. What is more, the corporate income tax must be paid only when a company makes money, so why should it be lowered now?
History has taught us that while cutting taxes is a politically popular move, raising taxes is not, which means that once taxes are cut, it would be hard to restore them to their previous levels, which is also a challenge for Taiwan’s fiscal health.
The previous and current governments have launched a spate of tax cuts since 2000, touting them as necessary moves to revive the economy. The truth is that lowering the land value incremental tax rate resulted in more real-estate speculation, the reduction in the inheritance and gift tax rate led businesspeople to repatriate funds into the property market rather than into real economic activity, and the dividend income tax cuts and the tax breaks for repatriated funds have not yielded the expected economic propulsion benefits.
Another tranche of stimulus vouchers would do little to boost the economy at this point, as private consumption has returned to normal. Despite uncertainties in terms of the global pandemic and the situation of major economies, the government should not rush to launch another voucher program or tax cuts.
As the nation’s finances have significantly deteriorated this year due to the economic downturn, lower tax revenues and higher expenditures, the government needs to avoid recklessly spending money in case the economy again encounters headwinds.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS