Perhaps US Customs and Border Protection can achieve what the Executive Yuan, Taiwanese lawmakers and the threat of EU sanctions have failed to: get the Fisheries Agency to really clean up the nation’s deep-sea industry, not just pay lip service with laws that barely put a dent in the cowboy operations of major violators.
The US agency on Tuesday last week blocked all shipments from the Vanuatu-flagged, but Taiwanese-owned Da Wang from all US ports after what it called credible reports of abusive working conditions and forced labor aboard the vessel.
Its Office of Trade placed a Withhold Release Order (WRO) on all seafood harvested by the Da Wang, meaning that any seafood from the ship imported into the US will be held until the importers can prove that the items were not produced with forced labor.
It was the third WRO imposed on a Taiwan-linked vessel in the past year-and-a-half.
Taiwan has more than 1,000 flagged ships and another 300 or so that are foreign-flagged, but locally owned. About 36 percent of the globe’s tuna longliner fleet is Taiwanese, the most of any nation. Taiwan is one of the world’s top three seafood producers and its fleet the second-largest on the high seas.
However, the relative anonymity of the industry and the lack of an easily identifiable brand name that foreign consumers can link to Taiwanese seafood contribute to the situation in which means of putting pressure on the industry are limited, except for the threat of sanctions, which the EU wielded fairly successfully over three-and-a-half years.
However, a year after the EU lifted its yellow card and commended Taiwan for its efforts to reform the legal framework for its fisheries, two Taiwan-linked ships were hit with WROs by the US.
Obviously, the reforms have not been enough.
Yet there is one tool reform advocates have now that they lacked in the past: In January, Kaoshiung-based Fong Chun Formosa Fishery Co (FCF) bought US-based Bumble Bee Foods, a 111-year-old brand of canned tuna and salmon.
With 10 fishing bases worldwide, 48-year-old FCF is the largest tuna supplier in the western Pacific, and in the wake of the WRO, company officials confirmed that it was supplied by the Da Wang at least once last year.
FCF president Max Chou said in January that his company and Bumble Bee shared a commitment to sustainability and global fisheries conservation, adding that the acquisition “puts us in an advantageous position for sustained growth and leadership throughout the tuna and salmon industries.”
Owning such a well-known brand means that FCF is to face more pressure than before, and it must ensure that corporate practices meet international regulations and standards, not just Taiwan’s.
However, Taiwan’s standards still need toughening. The Fisheries Agency has repeatedly said that it has limited oversight powers over flag of convenience vessels such as the Da Wang, even though they might operate out of Kaohsiung or other local ports, because they are registered in a foreign country.
Taiwanese law does not ban the purchase of seafood harvested by vessels that are suspected of involvement in human trafficking, but the agency would be glad if FCF took steps on its own to remove such vessels from its supply chain, a senior official said.
It is time for such buck-passing to end. Taiwan’s international reputation is being hurt by the actions of its deep-sea fishery industry and the inaction of its bureaucrats.
There should be labor inspections of every deep-sea vessel returning to a Taiwanese port, whether it is Taiwan-flagged or not; there should be time limits for a vessel’s operation at sea without returning to port, and better support should be offered to migrant fishers, including ending entry restrictions on them, which has been proven to enable labor abuses.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS