A new national campaign against food waste has sparked a rare bout of speculation over Beijing’s ability to safely feed 1.4 billion Chinese when faced with floods, epidemics, locusts and rising tensions with some of its biggest trading partners.
The sudden and massive push to curb the problem of discarded leftovers — known as the “Clean Plates Campaign” — has puzzled experts who keep a close watch on the world’s biggest consumer of everything from grains to meat.
Chinese government officials have stressed that the country’s food reserves are ample, but some observers nevertheless questioned the timing of a campaign aimed at reducing consumption when China’s economy is still recovering from the effects of COVID-19.
Illustration: Yusha
Bloomberg this week spoke with almost a dozen agricultural traders, food company officials and industry researchers about the initiative, the majority of whom said they believed the push was targeted at reducing dependence on food imports in preparation for possible supply disruptions. The Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“Fears of supply disruptions due to COVID-19 have caused China’s leaders to re-emphasize food security and self-sufficiency,” StoneX senior Asia commodity analyst Darin Friedrichs said. “This includes diversifying where grain is sourced from abroad, but also making efforts to reduce food waste domestically.”
Political tensions have threatened trade flows in some market segments, and earlier this year, national governments started reducing exports and safeguarding local supplies because of worries over the COVID-19 pandemic — limiting the availability of food shipments to other countries.
Heavily reliant on protein imports to feed its people, concerns about breaks in the global food supply chain are particularly salient for China, whose leaders have long made economic development and personal enrichment a centerpiece of their rule.
The world could be facing “multiple famines of biblical proportions within a short few months,” World Food Programme Executive Director David Beasley said in April, citing the impact of the pandemic as well as more frequent natural disasters and changing weather patterns.
MASSIVE FLOODING
Biblical developments have contributed to concerns over China’s food supply this year. The country’s southern provinces have experienced massive flooding and swarms of locusts. Pork prices are beginning to tick up, even as China attempts to rebuild its supply of pigs after an outbreak of African swine fever-devastated herds, contributing to an overall jump in food inflation.
Fears that imported goods might be contaminated by COVID-19 have added to the pressure, with the southern city of Guangzhou ordering cold storage companies to suspend imports of frozen meat and seafood from pandemic-hit regions after the local government in nearby Shenzhen discovered COVID-19 on chicken wings imported from Brazil.
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) push to tackle the “shocking and distressing” problem of discarded leftovers has been swift and intense, with the national legislature scheduled to fast-track new rules as part of the effort. Livestreamers who film themselves eating huge amounts of food have been censured, while catering associations have urged restaurants to put limits on the number of dishes patrons can order.
Xi has been encouraging his country to build up its domestic economic strength in the face of intensifying external risks, including rising tensions with the US. Some veteran China experts believe the food waste campaign, launched on Aug. 11, is part of a similar long-term effort to increase food self-sufficiency.
Chinese Minister of Agriculture Han Changfu (韓長賦) this month stressedthe importance of keeping the people’s rice bowl filled with locally grown grain.
The campaign suggests that Beijing has started preparing for a theoretical worst-case scenario of a food supply shortage, three of the people surveyed by Bloomberg said. They asked to remain anonymous given the topic’s sensitivity in a country where food holds pride of place in many homes, and where memories of the Great Famine under former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) still linger.
“Food security is an important foundation for state security. Food wastage appears to be about individual behavior, but it could lead to extensive perils,” a People’s Daily analysis said last week.
About 35 million tonnes of food are wasted in China every year, representing almost 6 percent of its total output, the analysis said, adding that food supply in China would be tightly balanced for an extended period given rising costs, limited resources and solid demand.
China’s rapid economic development has drastically altered the nation’s food needs, with residents in cosmopolitan coastal provinces demanding ever more meat, chocolate, wine and coffee. That has contributed to skyrocketing consumption of animal feed, and dramatically increased China’s dependence on foreign crops including US soybeans, Australian barley and African cocoa and coffee beans.
So far, there is no sign that China has been procuring less food from overseas. Imports of farm products have been growing fast this year, with purchases of US corn and soybeans accelerating in the past few months. China has also boosted this year’s estimate for soybean imports to a record of 96 million tonnes, citing strong demand for protein-rich soybean meal for animal feed.
BILATERAL TENSIONS
However, rising political tensions between China and the US threaten to derail future orders, or force China to boost procurement from other trading partners at a time of uncertainty.
US exports of agricultural and related products to China in the first two quarters reached about 20 percent of this year’s target of US$36.5 billion agreed under the US-China phase one trade deal, even as the shipments were 6.3 percent higher year-on-year, according to US Department of Agriculture data.
China also halted some beef imports from Australia, and in May placed tariffs on the country’s barley shipments following the conclusion of an earlier anti-dumping probe. The Chinese embassy in Canberra in April said that Chinese consumers might choose to boycott Australian goods.
“In the context of the Great Decoupling, Beijing will, where possible, buy from countries in its sphere of political and economic influence,” Enodo Economics chief economist Diana Choyleva wrote in a report published earlier this month, noting that China’s large grain reserves were likely “overstated.”
A spokesman for the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics said at a press conference this month that the country has relatively sufficient grain stocks due to bumper harvests over the past five years. Grains harvested this summer — which include wheat and early rice — have increased by 0.9 percent year-on-year to a new record despite the floods, the spokesman said. Grains harvested in the fall account for over 70 percent of the nation’s total production and should be unscathed by the summer flooding, he added
While the intrusiveness of Xi’s anti-food waste campaign has led to it being dissected and occasionally criticized on social media, some have interpreted the move as a simple reminder to avoid unnecessary excess. Two industry executives interviewed by Bloomberg said that the campaign was a continuation of policies to reduce waste going back to at least 2013.
Meanwhile, the Chinese state-run Global Times has rejected the “media hype” and suggestions that the campaign might be connected to a looming food shortage, saying that it is merely about “an issue that deserves more attention.”
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor