Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse.
Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China.
Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation.
Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors; “plagiarism clans,” in which graduate students copy from their adviser’s thesis or dissertation; heavyweight academics using public funds to build academic paper mills; and project teachers or assistant professors hiring ghostwriters to finish their papers.
More recently, graduate students unable to complete their master’s theses and doctoral dissertations have hired ghostwriters to do it for them.
Politicians who buy their way into universities and then hire others to attend classes and ghostwrite their thesis and dissertation are in effect buying their diplomas.
Former minister of national defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) and former minister of education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) were forced to step down in 2013 and 2014 respectively due to allegations of plagiarism and using fake peer reviews.
Even Lee Si-chen (李嗣涔) and Yang Pan-chyr (楊泮池) faced academic scandals during their tenures as National Taiwan University president.
Why do Taiwanese academics continue to breach ethics instead of learning from their mistakes?
Former minister of science and technology Yang Hung-duen (楊弘敦) once tried to comfort himself by saying that this has been a problem throughout history. He said it was a problem with human nature and demanded that universities improve how they teach academic ethics.
Graduate students are required to take an online examination in research ethics. However, passing the test is easy, as they can find the answers on their smartphone while taking the test on a computer. The online examination essentially encourages them to pass an ethics test by unethical means.
In Taiwan, there is barely any mechanism to take disciplinary action against someone who breaches academic ethics. Most only receive a written warning, while their right to apply for national research projects is suspended and awards and prize money are partially reclaimed.
This systemically encourages research fraud.
In the initial investigation of an ethics breach, evidence is often never found, as academics shield one another. In the case of Yang and Chiang, for example, the government merely suspended their rights to apply for national research grants.
Hwang Woo-suk, a South Korean researcher accused in 2005 of fraud, was dismissed by Seoul National University in 2006, prohibited from serving as a professor at a public university for five years, and his pension was halved.
In 2009, he was sentenced to a two-year suspended prison term after he was found guilty of embezzlement, which was later reduced by six months to an 18-month term on appeal.
An old Chinese saying goes: “Academic officials’ shamelessness is a disgrace to the nation.”
In a society where a sense of shame and strict regulations are absent, the public become the victims of academic fraud, while students learn how to live a fraudulent life at school.
Tai Po-fen is a professor of sociology at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
“Testy,” “divisive,” “frigid,” “an exchange of insults” were some of the media descriptions of last month’s meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, between US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan and their Chinese counterparts. Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haass said that, rather than the “deft handling” needed in US-China relations, this encounter was “mishandled, a terrible start [with] way too much public signaling.” Yet, contrary to conventional wisdom, the acrimonious encounter with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) and Chinese Central Foreign Affairs Commission Director Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) was a great success for US diplomacy
In studies of Taiwan’s demographic changes, the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica has found that a mere 36.5 percent of men and 19.6 percent of women think getting married is an important life event. The institute also found that the government spending money or amending laws and regulations in order to encourage families to have children is having no impact on the birthrate. Opinions differ on whether this kind of change is a matter of national security, as Japan faces a similar situation, without having a negative impact on its economic strength. Fewer women are willing to marry and the divorce
Interrupting the assimilation of Xinjiang’s Uighur population would result in an unmanageable national security threat to China. Numerous governments and civil society organizations around the world have accused China of massive human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and labeled Beijing’s inhumane and aggressive social re-engineering efforts in the region as “cultural genocide.” Extensive evidence shows that China’s forceful ethnic assimilation policies in Xinjiang are aimed at replacing Uighur ethnic and religious identity with a so-called scientific communist dogma and Han Chinese culture. The total assimilation of Uighurs into the larger “Chinese family” is also Beijing’s official, central purpose of its ethnic policies
Early last month, China’s rubber-stamp legislature, the National People’s Congress (NPC), officially approved the country’s 14th Five-Year Plan. The strategy was supposed to demonstrate that China has a long-term economic vision that would enable it to thrive, despite its geopolitical contest with the US. However, before the ink on the NPC’s stamp could dry, China had already begun sabotaging the plan’s chances of success. The new plan’s centerpiece is the “dual-circulation” strategy, according to which China would aim to foster growth based on domestic demand and technological self-sufficiency. This would not only reduce China’s reliance on external demand; it would also