Kaohsiung City Councilor Jane Lee (李眉蓁) — the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate in the Kaohsiung mayoral by-election — has been accused of plagiarism and violating academic ethics after it was discovered that her master’s thesis was almost identical to Minister of Overseas Community Affairs Tung Chen-yuan’s (童振源) paper titled Political and Economic Exchanges Across the Taiwan Strait.
When the case was first reported, Lee argued that as National Sun Yat-sen University (NSYSU), which approved her work, has “very high standards,” she did not think there was any problem with her thesis, as it had passed a university review.
However, the university late last year revoked a graduate degree issued in 2018 due to plagiarism and the paper of one of the university’s researchers published in an international academic journal early this year was retracted in May for violating academic ethics.
Simply saying that the university has “very high standards” is clearly not sufficient to prove that there is no problem with her thesis.
Higher education in Taiwan has been haunted by plagiarism for years. Several papers published by Taiwanese professors have been retracted in just the past few months.
The Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technology have proposed preventive measures over the past decade to fight academic plagiarism, but their efforts seem to have been in vain.
A look into the cause of the problem shows that many Taiwanese universities would rather settle a plagiarism dispute quietly.
Some colleges and universities even have so-called “plagiarism clans.” For example, even if a graduate student copies their adviser’s doctoral dissertation in their own thesis, the student might still be able to pass the oral defense and obtain the degree if their adviser is on the oral defense committee.
Reports of such cases are often presented on the Internet, but the authorities have failed to investigate them thoroughly.
The argument that NSYSU has “very high standards” is challenged by the fact that theses violate academic ethics, but its reputation has not been shattered, as it has not covered up the truth in the Lee situation in an attempt to save face.
Amid the responses of other local universities to plagiarism, NSYSU taking responsibility for passing a thesis that violated academic ethics by revoking the degree is a rare example of good standards. In doing so, the institute displayed its academic conscience and moral courage, and it is doing a better job than education authorities.
Lee on Thursday last week finally issued a public apology, saying that she would fully respect the results of an investigation by her alma mater.
Hopefully, the university will maintain its standards as it investigates the issue, which would help address problems caused by negligence that led it to lose control of the quality of a student’s knowledge and thesis.
By doing so, it would show that it indeed has “very high standards.”
Niu Ming is a university researcher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS